The transparent intellectual fraud that is Darwinismhttp://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/009364.html
add also that process philosophers since William James have made the argument that an acid test for any proposition is whether one can live as if it is really true. That is, can o
Darwinists keep injecting into the Darwinian story line the very elements that the Darwinian theory of evolution by random mutation and natural selection formally excludes: intent
http://legalhistorysources.com/Law508/tierney2.htmhttp://legalhistorysources.com/Law508/tierney2.htm
much disputed. Jurists, philosophers, and historians have quarreled over when, where, and how our ideas emerged. At the extreme end of the scale they have even disputed whether a
Socratic Ignorance in Democracy, the Free Market, and Sciencehttps://friesian.com/socrates.htm
virtues. With the philosophers in power, ex hypothese , the wise will rule -- although Plato himself, like Socrates, elsewhere (as in the Symposium ) defines the philosophers as t
John Locke (1632-1704)https://friesian.com/locke.htm
one of the first modern philosophers to even have an academic career. But this was not in philosophy, whose university form at the time Locke did not like. Instead, Locke became a
Pluralism in the Western Thoughthttp://www.ghandchi.com/301-PluralismEng.htm
not limited to analytic philosophers such as Nelson Goodman (author of Many Ways of World Making). It is promoted by diverse scientists and philosophers ranging from David Bohm
Pluralism historically has been associated with democratic thinking
POLIS: The Empire of Man vs. the City of Godhttp://vftonline.org/Patriarchy/definitions/polis.htm
them all. Stoic philosophers sought a substitute theory of the local religious rites-based theory of the city-state. The substitute was a theory of universal mankind , an idea for
Four Arguments for Transcendencehttps://www.peterkreeft.com/topics-more/4-arguments-transcendence.htm
usual position among philosophers in the Western world today, in fact the most usual position among academics generally, is some kind of reductionism. By “reductionism
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.https://larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3045pagan_isaac.html
sort of political philosophers and kindred scoundrels might consider to be excessive admiration for the practice of scientific progress. Therefore, by such "brainwashing" of popul
Find more...