Legal Foundations of a Free Societyhttps://xenisa.github.io/kinsella/lffs/legal-foundations-of-a-free-society.html
and fancies of some philosophers that are supposed to do the job. But this is hardly less arbitrary, one would think! And, of course, since no real person had or could have agreed
Socratic Ignorance in Democracy, the Free Market, and Sciencehttps://friesian.com/socrates.htm
virtues. With the philosophers in power, ex hypothese , the wise will rule -- although Plato himself, like Socrates, elsewhere (as in the Symposium ) defines the philosophers as t
A Rational Critique of Ayn Rand's Objectivismhttps://zerocontradictions.net/misc/critiquing-ayn-rands-objectivism
Compared to most philosophers, Rand was one of the best to have existed up to her lifetime. She identified many good positions: There is no such thing as supernatural phenomena (i
This essay extensively critiques, quotes, and refutes the errors within Ayn Rand's Philosophy of Objectivism, with links to external sources for elaboration.
The Proceedings of the Friesian Schoolhttps://friesian.com/
the Friesians or other philosophers mentioned below directly are sought if they parallel or supplement Kantian or Friesian doctrine, from metaphysics to political economy, or thro
An electronic journal of philosophy, promoting the principles and the further development of the Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and the Friesian School,
Jews--The Archetypal Multiculturalistshttp://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/024334.html
beings. The classical philosophers taught the virtue of sophrosyne , or temperance, by which the respective parts of man’s being or of society restrain themselves to their p
The below is a chapter--written in 1998 and not edited or changed since then--from the vast unpublished book on mass...
In Praise of Passivityhttps://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/papers/passivity.htm
under the purview of philosophers: evaluative knowledge. This type of knowledge, too, is difficult to test; indeed, it may be impossible in principle to test. (I of course do not
G.W.F. Hegelhttps://friesian.com/hegel.htm
shame of the German philosophers to have transformed the patrician virgin who honored the gods into a harpy engaged in shrieking the glory of her children. Julien Benda (1867-1956
The Fallacies of Egoism and Altruism, and the Fundamental Principle of Moralityhttps://friesian.com/moral-1.htm
reason far from being philosophers themselves! Even the great Chinaman of Koenigsberg was only a great critic. Friedrich Nietzsche , Beyond Good and Evil , translated by Marianne
Kay Herrmann in Conversation with Rene Saranhttps://friesian.com/saran.htm
my mother nor I were philosophers, but both became politically active and shared common ethical values which had their origin in Leonard Nelsons's philosophy. My mother had read m
Rationality: From AI to Zombieshttps://elizier.neocities.org/
illustrate how even philosophers and scientists can be led astray when they rely on intuitive, non-technical evolutionary or psychological accounts. By locating our minds within a
Pragmatism Cybraryhttp://www.pragmatism.org/
congress" of philosophers, and other related stakeholders, to discuss the future of philosophical practice (within and beyond the academy). We are interested in any paper pro
Push back against "Rothbard is an Objectivist" - Kameralized / Informal Discussions - Ancap / Anarcho-Objectivist Forumhttps://anarcho-objectivism.st/viewtopic.php?pid=6
ignore these Christian philosophers and to attempt to carve out an ethical system purely on one's own is to court folly and disaster. Apart from their respective merits, then
Find more...