Social Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2008 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/fall2008/entries/epistemology-social/
to find historical philosophers who made at least brief forays into the social dimensions of knowledge or rational belief. In his dialogue Charmides , Plato posed the question of
Robert Heinlein, The Libertarian in the Lifeboathttps://friesian.com/heinlein.htm
and especially of their philosophers, such as Ayn Rand (1905-1982), Murray Rothbard (1926-1995), and Robert Nozick (1938-2002) -- the latter's Anarchy, the State, and Utopia [1974
Legal Foundations of a Free Societyhttps://xenisa.github.io/kinsella/lffs/legal-foundations-of-a-free-society.html
and fancies of some philosophers that are supposed to do the job. But this is hardly less arbitrary, one would think! And, of course, since no real person had or could have agreed
The Libertarian Alliancehttp://www.la-articles.org.uk/
prove more palatable to philosophers and others if taken to be analytic, tautological and, in all practice, indispensable." Read Online Mises.pdf Hitler: Puppet
Why Not an Objectivisthttps://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/papers/rand.htm
whatsoever, then the philosophers who claim there is a distinction must really be classifying statements entirely at random. If this is the case, what accounts for their intersubj
Communitarianismhttps://ethicalpolitics.org/blackwood/communitarianism.htm
and Hegel, political philosophers such as Alasdair MacIntyre, Michael Sandel, Charles Taylor and Michael Walzer disputed Rawls assumption that the principal task of government is
The New Right & Anarcho-Capitalismhttp://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.html
a group of American philosophers like JOHN HOSPERS and ERICMACK who adopt 'minarchy' rather than anarchy. They call for a minimalState, restricting the scope of the modern state t
Polycentric Lawhttp://www.ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/library/PolycentricLaw-TomBell.html
of this debate, few philosophers have yet to employ philosophical/normative arguments with the sole intent of justifying or refuting polycentric law. The vast literature concernin
Polycentric Law
SOcial Atomismhttps://gadfly.igc.org/libertarian/2-society.htm
view,” society is what philosophers call “an emergent entity.” Like chemical compounds such as water and table salt, the combination of elements produce a substance with propertie
Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?https://dhspriory.org/kenny/PhilTexts/Nozick/Capitalism.htm
and deemed that philosophers should rule; Aristotle held that intellectual contemplation was the highest activity. It is not surprising that surviving texts record this high evalu
Roderick T. Long's Home Pagehttps://praxeology.net/
and politics. The Greek philosophers are right about everything else. More about me . Still more about me . More about praxeology . More about anarchism . I teach philosophy at Au
Two Faces of Liberalismhttps://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/g/gray-liberalism.html
surprising that liberal philosophers differ about the most fundamental requirements of justice. Today, most liberal thinkers affirm that justice is the supreme virtue of social in
Find more...