Leonard Nelsonhttps://friesian.com/nelson.htm
going around among philosophers, some of whom are more honest about it than others. This serves to impeach philosophers in an area that should be of serious interest to them: Curi
Legal Foundations of a Free Societyhttps://xenisa.github.io/kinsella/lffs/legal-foundations-of-a-free-society.html
and fancies of some philosophers that are supposed to do the job. But this is hardly less arbitrary, one would think! And, of course, since no real person had or could have agreed
Logical Empiricism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2011 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/fall2011/entries/logical-empiricism/
a large number of able philosophers self-consciously participated and to distinguish logical empiricism from other movements. It does not, however, distinguish logical empiricism
Bayesian Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2009 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/ARCHIVES/WIN2009/entries/epistemology-bayesian/
to certainty. But many philosophers would object to assigning probability of one to any contingent statement, even an evidential statement, because, for example, it is well-known
Socratic Ignorance in Democracy, the Free Market, and Sciencehttps://friesian.com/socrates.htm
virtues. With the philosophers in power, ex hypothese , the wise will rule -- although Plato himself, like Socrates, elsewhere (as in the Symposium ) defines the philosophers as t
Rudolf Otto -- Fear and Tremendumhttps://friesian.com/otto.htm
to be sure, most philosophers of religion have difficulty, sometimes astonishing difficulty, focusing on actual religions in their own terms -- while philosophers often happen to
The Proceedings of the Friesian Schoolhttps://friesian.com/
the Friesians or other philosophers mentioned below directly are sought if they parallel or supplement Kantian or Friesian doctrine, from metaphysics to political economy, or thro
An electronic journal of philosophy, promoting the principles and the further development of the Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and the Friesian School,
Non-Intuitive Immediate Knowledgehttps://friesian.com/immedi-1.htm
reincarnation in any philosophers who have approached anywhere near Plato's stature. Even the Neo-Platonists discarded reincarnation and recollection in preference to Aristotelian
Sir Karl Popperhttps://friesian.com/popper.htm
to understand; and some philosophers, like Kant , had come close to recognizing it. It is still subject to some dispute, though mainly from those who misunderstand the rejection o
The Kant-Friesian Theory of Religion, Rudolf Ottohttps://friesian.com/numinos.htm
rigorous enough for philosophers) and is too easily misunderstood and dismissed as describing some kind of mysticism . Even in the history of religion, Otto's own analysis often d
Polynomic Theory of Value, Pleasure, Virtues of Franklin and Woodenhttps://friesian.com/poly-1.htm
not aware of historical philosophers (before Schiller) offering such a theory, despite the common aphorism that "The road to hell is paved with good intentions," which suggests so
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
Find more...