https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/paul-feyerabend-against-method.musehttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/paul-feyerabend-against-method.muse
(fact) and rationality. Philosophers then concluded that the various forms of rationalism that had offered their services had not only produced chimaeras but would have damaged th
The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2013/entries/incommensurability/
by two influential philosophers of science: Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. They appeared to be challenging the rationality of natural science and were called in Nature , “
Auguste Comte (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2012 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Fall2012/entries/comte/
late (Bourdeau 2007). Philosophers and sociologists have begun to draw attention to the interesting views defended over a century and a half ago by the founder of positivism. It t
Paul Feyerabend, Modern education as imposition (1978)http://panarchy.org/feyerabend/education.html
sophistications which philosophers had managed to accumulate over the ages and which liberals had surrounded with schmaltzy phrases to make them palatable the right thing to offer
A. Reynolds "What is historicism?"https://abuss.narod.ru/Biblio/eng/reynolds.htm
within a vacuum. Philosophers and scientists are always trained in a tradition of some kind and are thinking in response to other traditions and thinkers. Because traditions and t
Not Related! A Big-Braned Podcasthttps://notrelated.xyz/
by early 20th century philosophers to distinguish "science" from other realms. It overturns the assumptions of logical positivism and returns us to the conception of knowledge hel
HIST-Analytichttps://www.hist-analytic.com/
Brentano HELP For Czech Philosophers Carnap on the Lambda Operator Davidson, Akrasia, and Moore's Paradox (Revised) Nominalization and Event Causation: Vendler vs. Chisholm Russel
David Stove (1927-1994)https://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~jim/stovecampbelllife.htm
like many Australian philosophers of his generation, he came under the influence of Professor John Anderson. He absorbed Anderson?s realism, but was later to shake off other eleme
Find more...