The Project Gutenberg eBook of A General View of Positivism, by Auguste Comte.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/53799/pg53799-images.html
in a century; and philosophers have seldom had justice done them until some generations have passed. The difficulties presented by the scientific form of Comte’s works have been o
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Auguste Comte And Positivism, by John Stuart Mill.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/16833/pg16833-images.html
one upon which Positive philosophers must necessarily be agreed. It is one of M. Comte's mistakes that he never allows of open questions. Positive Philosophy maintains that within
Auguste Comte (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2012 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Fall2012/entries/comte/
late (Bourdeau 2007). Philosophers and sociologists have begun to draw attention to the interesting views defended over a century and a half ago by the founder of positivism. It t
Philosophy for Laymen - Bertrand Russellhttps://dhspriory.org/kenny/PhilTexts/Russell/PhilosophyLaymen.htm
which, but for the philosophers, might never have entered their heads. We may say that, on its theoretical side, philosophy consists, at least in part, in the framing of large gen
A. Reynolds "What is historicism?"https://abuss.narod.ru/Biblio/eng/reynolds.htm
within a vacuum. Philosophers and scientists are always trained in a tradition of some kind and are thinking in response to other traditions and thinkers. Because traditions and t
Logos Virtual Library: Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil, 3http://www.logoslibrary.org/nietzsche/beyond/3.html
to men and even to philosophers?perhaps it is time to become just a little indifferent here, to learn caution, or, better still, to look away, to go away ?Yet in the background of
Comte's classification of the sciences (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/comte
could expel “the philosophers, moralists and metaphysicians” from educational programs for their unscientific explanations of human behaviour ( Saint-Simon [1802] 1832
Auguste Comte is ostensibly the world's most famous classifier of the sciences in modern history. His whole life was dedicated to establishing a classification that conformed to t
G.W.F. Hegelhttps://friesian.com/hegel.htm
shame of the German philosophers to have transformed the patrician virgin who honored the gods into a harpy engaged in shrieking the glory of her children. Julien Benda (1867-1956
Liberalism and the Search for the Ground: Another Visit with Eric Voegelin | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4308
Prophets and the Greek Philosophers, however, a key “differentiation” occurs: Instead of plural “intra-cosmic gods” the most sensitive and articulate men now commonly intuit one G
Some Metaphysics of Angular Momentum and Gravityhttps://friesian.com/angular.htm
most, physicists and philosophers. After all, Einstein proved that Absolute Space doesn't exist . All space is Relative ; and Leibniz was decisively vindicated against Isaac Newto
Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sarte 1946https://dhspriory.org/kenny/PhilTexts/Sartre/SartreExistentialismHumanism.htm
for technicians and philosophers. All the same, it can easily be defined. The question is only complicated because there are two kinds of existentialists. There are, on the one ha
Find more...