Logical Empiricism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2011 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/fall2011/entries/logical-empiricism/
a large number of able philosophers self-consciously participated and to distinguish logical empiricism from other movements. It does not, however, distinguish logical empiricism
Bayesian Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2009 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/ARCHIVES/WIN2009/entries/epistemology-bayesian/
to certainty. But many philosophers would object to assigning probability of one to any contingent statement, even an evidential statement, because, for example, it is well-known
A Deuteronomy of Kant-Friesian Metaphysicshttps://friesian.com/deutero.htm
languages. "Analytic" philosophers liked to think that mathematics was enough of a "language" for them [ note ]. Thus, the Great Debate in the Middle Ages, which was between Reali
HIST-Analytichttps://www.hist-analytic.com/
Brentano HELP For Czech Philosophers Carnap on the Lambda Operator Davidson, Akrasia, and Moore's Paradox (Revised) Nominalization and Event Causation: Vendler vs. Chisholm Russel
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
Popper on the A Priorihttps://friesian.com/samra.htm
arguments from other philosophers levied against Kant. The logicist projects from Frege and Russell provided arguments against Kant's intuitionalist mathematics. Poincar? had alre
Find more...