The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2013/entries/incommensurability/
by two influential philosophers of science: Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. They appeared to be challenging the rationality of natural science and were called in Nature , “
The Mythopoeic Society - The Horn of Rohanhttps://www.mythsoc.org/horn-of-rohan.htm
linguists, philosophers, theologians, ethnologists, sociologists, and all other scholars interested in the following areas: 1. Mythopoeia and new mythology in literature - mythic
Legal Positivism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2009 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/spr2009/entries/legal-positivism/
analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings. 1. Development and Influe
Logos Virtual Library: Nietzsche: The Antichristhttp://www.logoslibrary.org/nietzsche/antichrist.html
by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!? 8 It is necessary to say just whom we regard as our antagonists: theologians and all who have any theological blood in their ve
Thomas Hobbes: Leviathanhttps://constitution.org/2-Authors/th/leviatha.htm
at all, from deceived philosophers and deceived, or deceiving, Schoolmen. CHAPTER IV OF SPEECH THE INVENTION of printing, though ingenious, compared with the invention of letters
When a Fallacy is Not a Fallacyhttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/fallacy.htm
classical and medieval philosophers, which is why most of these fallacies have Latin names. Traditional Western philosophy, however, recognized that logical deduction or dialectic
Comte's classification of the sciences (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/comte
could expel “the philosophers, moralists and metaphysicians” from educational programs for their unscientific explanations of human behaviour ( Saint-Simon [1802] 1832
Auguste Comte is ostensibly the world's most famous classifier of the sciences in modern history. His whole life was dedicated to establishing a classification that conformed to t
John Stuart Mill, The Utility of Religionhttp://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/three/utilrelig.html
of, as sceptical philosophers are sometimes inclined to believe. It is not enough to aver, in general terms, that there never can be any conflict between truth and utility; that i
REFLECTIONS ON ISLAM. The unknown roots. Myth versus enlightenment.https://wichm.home.xs4all.nl/islam.html
and philosophy. Muslim philosophers had islamatised Greek philosophical traditions. Aristotle can still not be studied without reference to Ibn S?n? (Avicenna,d.1037) and Ibn Rush
A psychological approach to Islam, its myth and vague origins, its glory and decline.
A brief refutation of materialist atheismhttp://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010080.html
the same as what the philosophers call “naturalism,” is irrational. For example, if non-physical entities really existed, they would not be detectable with your senses
Alan Roebuck writes: Dear materialist atheists: While some of you, including some who participate at VFR, are content to allow...
Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, Essay 1http://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/nietzsche/beyondgoodandevil1html.html
ON THE PREJUDICES OF PHILOSOPHERS 1 The will to truth, which is still going to tempt us to many a daring exploit, that celebrated truthfulness of which all philosoph
Robert Heinlein, The Libertarian in the Lifeboathttps://friesian.com/heinlein.htm
and especially of their philosophers, such as Ayn Rand (1905-1982), Murray Rothbard (1926-1995), and Robert Nozick (1938-2002) -- the latter's Anarchy, the State, and Utopia [1974
Find more...