• Modern Physics a Fraud? - Superfluid helium? Speed of light a limit?, incredibility of quantum theory, Heisenberg's misunderstanding ohttp://big-lies.org/modern-physics-a-fraud/
leaning on quantum mechanics. Thus in John Gribbin's Q is for Quantum (1998) we find: Superfluidity The way liquid helium flows without friction at very low temperatures. This is
Articles on Modern Theoretical Physics (rather than Empiricism and Technology). 'Superfluid helium', myth of the limiting speed of light, unanswered relativity paper, nuclear fra
viXra.org e-Print archive, Astrophysicshttps://vixra.org/astro/
In standard orbital mechanics, angular momentum energy is implicitly included in the orbital kinetic energy along the ascent spiral, but it is not treated as an independent, ortho
Why Does Anything Exist? Section Eighthttps://www.hedweb.com/nihilism/nihilf08.htm
If quantum mechanics is a true theory of the world, then the wave function of a system contains all the information about the system's physical state - position, momentum, energy,
What links post-Everett QM; the cancellation of the Universe's conserved constants to zero; black holes; and zero construed as a number in mathematics?
Crop Circles - Their Meaning ahttp://www.greatdreams.com/crpcirc.htm
Circles & Quantum Mechanics Diatonic ratios, interference patterns Links To Other Sites Best Sites - My Favorites Lucy Pringle good articles & great photographs Crop Circl
The Problem of Induction, by Sir Karl Popperhttps://dhspriory.org/kenny/PhilTexts/Popper/Induction.htm
classical Newtonian mechanics. There never was a more successful theory. If repeated observational success could establish a theory, it would have established Newton's theory. Yet
Thomas Carlyle's "Signs of the Times"https://victorianweb.org/authors/carlyle/signs/signs1.html
nature, as well as of Mechanics . There is a science which treats of, and practically addresses, the primary, unmodified forces and energies of man, the mysterious springs of Love
Popper on the A Priorihttps://friesian.com/samra.htm
successes of Newtonian Mechanics, Kant strove to justify inductive inferences (and therefore scientific methods) via an argument that was not itself inductive. Popper does not bel
https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/decline.txthttps://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/decline.txt
invention of quantum mechanics.) However, scientists have been notoriously bad in deciding on priorities between subjects. Unfortunately, such choices seem inescapable. While scie
Kay Herrmannhttps://friesian.com/kay.htm
metaphysics. The pure mechanics, consisting of three parts are these: A study of geometrical movement, which considers solely the direction of the movement A study of kinematics,
Reference Pieces on Spacehttps://friesian.com/space.htm
features of quantum mechanics such that empty space is not really empty. It's full of virtual particles that have real physical effects -- particularly that they mediate the trans
SOME CRUCIAL ISSUES OF MIND-BODY MONISMhttps://ditext.com/feigl/mbm.html
of quantum mechanics is really called for. For our purposes, and with some simplification, we can regard the assumptions of critical realism as among the premises of a hypothetico
Basic Issues in Natural Philosophy: Part Ihttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/physics/physics1.htm
In Newtonian mechanics, where an initial state A strongly determines a final state B via a fixed equation, it is no less true that B determines A, but no one says that the future
Find more...