Chapter Ihttps://nekhbet.com/popper/chapter-01.html
inevitably seem, to the philosophers who read him, to be maintaining something extremely implausible. Such a writer must make that impression, in fact, unless the way he writes ef
Logos Virtual Library: Nietzsche: The Antichristhttp://www.logoslibrary.org/nietzsche/antichrist.html
by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!? 8 It is necessary to say just whom we regard as our antagonists: theologians and all who have any theological blood in their ve
When a Fallacy is Not a Fallacyhttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/fallacy.htm
classical and medieval philosophers, which is why most of these fallacies have Latin names. Traditional Western philosophy, however, recognized that logical deduction or dialectic
Computation isn't Consciousness: The Chinese Room Experimenthttps://lukesmith.neocities.org/vids/chinese_room
than analytic philosophers, and therefore there is a clear divide between viewing consciousness as just merely being awake and having certain degrees of brain activity, and nebulo
Mathematical theory of classification (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/mathematical_theory_of_classification.htm
a long history where philosophers (Aristotle) and natural scientists (Linnaeus) took a great part. But since the 19th century (with the growth of chemistry and library science) an
One of the main topics of scientific research, classification, is the operation consisting of distributing objects in classes or groups which are, in general, less numerous than th
William James : The Nitrous Oxide Philosopherhttps://www.general-anaesthesia.com/misc/nitrous-philosophy.html
and certain mystical philosophers including Hegel, were "unusually susceptible" to these extraordinary forms of consciousness. James's experiences with nitrous oxide helped to cry
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Auguste Comte And Positivism, by John Stuart Mill.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/16833/pg16833-images.html
one upon which Positive philosophers must necessarily be agreed. It is one of M. Comte's mistakes that he never allows of open questions. Positive Philosophy maintains that within
The Proceedings of the Friesian Schoolhttps://friesian.com/
the Friesians or other philosophers mentioned below directly are sought if they parallel or supplement Kantian or Friesian doctrine, from metaphysics to political economy, or thro
An electronic journal of philosophy, promoting the principles and the further development of the Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and the Friesian School,
Objectivity Without Objectivismhttps://stpeter.im/writings/rand/objectivity.html
between scientists and philosophers, especially where they meet in the borderlands between biology, the social sciences, and the humanities. We are approaching a new age of synthe
Religion and Humanism, Why I am not a Christianhttps://friesian.com/why.htm
, the "natural philosophers" (in Latin, philosophi naturales ). Their focus on nature contrasts with the emphasis in Indian and Chinese philosophy (on salvation and morality) and
THE PUSH AND CRITICAL DRINKERShttps://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~jim/push.html
were largely run by philosophers; the Push was a wider movement of which the Libertarian Society was a core and source of ideology. The Freethought Society, as we saw, was a vehic
Leonard Nelsonhttps://friesian.com/nelson.htm
going around among philosophers, some of whom are more honest about it than others. This serves to impeach philosophers in an area that should be of serious interest to them: Curi
Find more...