On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy (1856)http://webarchive.me/geocities/Heartland/5654/orthodox/kireyevsky_new-principles.html
convictions than the philosophers themselves. For what kind of religion is it that cannot stand in the light of science and consciousness? What kind of faith is it that is incompa
Ivan Kireyevsky: On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy (1856)
Stove, What Is Wrong With Our Thoughtshttps://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/%7Ejim/wrongthoughts.html
enquire what the pagan philosophers of that time were thinking about, we expect to hear of something more rational, at least, than questions about the Trinity. And so we do, at an
The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.https://larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3045pagan_isaac.html
sort of political philosophers and kindred scoundrels might consider to be excessive admiration for the practice of scientific progress. Therefore, by such "brainwashing" of popul
Marxist Thought & Monism -Second Editionhttp://www.ghandchi.com/2055-MarxismEng.htm
said : "The philosophers have merely *interpreted* the world in various ways; the point, however, is to *change* it." (Karl Marx, 'Theses on Feuerbach ', CharlesLewis
این رساله نتیجه پژوهشهایی درباره مونیسم و پلورالیسم بود که این قلم در ایران در پی انقلاب 1357 و به قدر
POSTMODERNISM AND THE WORLD’S RELIGIONShttp://allamaiqbal.com/publications/journals/review/oct05/03.htm
historicism of German philosophers― Hegel, Nietzsche, and Heidegger― that paved the way for Postmodernism, as our century closes, [10] it is the French who have taken the lead. Th
Find more...