The Second Sex - The Feminist eZinehttp://www.feministezine.com/feminist/books/The-Second-Sex-Simone-de-Beauvoir.html
over-wintering. Certain biologists in the past concluded from these facts that even in species capable of asexual propagation occasional fertilisation is necessary to renew the vi
Cretin Hop!https://philosophy.nekhbet.com/cretin.shtml
world with it. To him, biologists are not entitled to choose their own Sexual Selection terminology. Evo-bio must bow to him. The paradoxical irony is that had non-human organisms
philosophy, science, physics, biology, gravity, sexual selection, Gerald M Koufeldt, Rob L Norton.
Purposefulness of classification (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/purposefulness.htm
the biological world. Biologists do not have access to one objective “view from nowhere” but their taxonomies reflect diverging perspectives that are shaped by diverse
This article defends the thesis that all classifications serve some purposes better than others, and therefore that the idea of an all-purpose classification is untenable. This sho
Darwinian insecticidehttps://philosophy.nekhbet.com/chem.shtml
Until such time that biologists amass sufficient evidence to refute their own theory, the terms: "preference", "resistance", "(active, passive and cryptic) choice", "gift", "compe
philosophy, science, biology, evolution, Sexual Selection, Darwin, Rob L Norton.
ARCHIMEDES - GREATEST SCIENTIST EVER?https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/archimedes.html
it was less relevant to biologists such as Mendel (father of genetics), Darwin & Wallace , (evolution theory), and especially Pasteur , whose work on the germ theory of disease (w
We Want Our 4 Causes Back! | Luke Smithhttps://lukesmith.xyz/articles/we-want-our-4-causes-back/
and I suspect most biologists which mostly missed the argument and were languishing in the culture wars of the Bush Years. Mind you, I don't agree with the book, but it's mostly b
Can we really have "science" without teleology and something like a final cause?
An inedible vegetablehttps://philosophy.nekhbet.com/vege.shtml
biology. Evolutionary biologists pursue metaphor - not reality. Film at 11! Khuno wrote: You need to be rightly shamed for this, too. You are making the grossest anthropomorphicat
philosophy, logic, evolution, Sexual Selection, paradox, Rob L Norton, Khuno.
NMSR Speakers!http://www.nmsr.org/speakers.htm
not made their case to biologists, and don't deserve equal time in schools, because the fact of evolution appears to be incontrovertible. Gammill proceeded with a laundry list of
Goo To You (Education)http://gootoyou.com/
of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.” The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much
How does natural selection explain goo-to-you evolution? Evolution does not explain the origin of the diversity of life. It adds millions of years to explanations to compensate fo
What's New! January 1994http://home.mcom.com/home/whatsnew/whats_new_0194.html
Of special interest to biologists are the Biologist's Control Panel , and the CEPH-Genethon Data Interface , which allows browsing and searching of the CEPH-Genethon physical map
The Other Idol-Breaker: Owen Barfield and the Plenitude of the Word | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4192
When geologists and biologists accept Baconian premises, the result is the dual farrago of random selection and the survival of the fittest. In Barfield’s characterization, Marx a
Theisticargumentshttps://dhspriory.org/kenny/PhilTexts/Plantinga/TheisticArguments.htm
The conference of biologists and mathematicians ("Mathematical Challenges to the NeoDarwinian Interpretation of Evolution", ed. Paul Morehead and Martin Kaplan, Philadelphia, Wist
Find more...