History of Philosophyhttps://friesian.com/history.htm
be one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th Century. Πολυμαθίη νόον ἔχ
Orgy of the Will: A Philosophy of the Futurehttp://orgyofthewill.net/
God 1607. Critics not philosophers 1606. Read everywhere 1605. Old icy 1604. Paying the poor 1603. Too gay for thought 1602. The subject and its audience 1601. It's coming 1600. T
Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2007 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2007/entries/moral-epistemology/
Traditionally philosophers have sought to explain the possibility of knowledge by appeal to at least some principles that can be grasped and defended a priori and thus independent
Dialetheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2010 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/dialetheism/
the face of what most philosophers take to be common sense. Actually, that dialetheism challenges the LNC needs qualification, since the LNC is accepted as a general logical law i
Basic Philosophy, A Guide for the Intellectually Perplexed, Meta-philosophy, Common Sense Philosophy, also, A Collection of Fundamental Ideas,https://www.basicincome.com/bp/
called ‘ Squashed Philosophers ’ that is the answer to your (perhaps unconscious) prayer. His brilliant idea was to take the works of the great philosophers from Plato
An organized collection of ideas (esp. logic, certainty, faith, freedom, common sense, mystery, paradox, language...) for truth seekers, idea lovers, etc. The laws of thought, limi
Popper on the A Priorihttps://friesian.com/samra.htm
arguments from other philosophers levied against Kant. The logicist projects from Frege and Russell provided arguments against Kant's intuitionalist mathematics. Poincar? had alre
http://www.luminist.org/archives/kleps_millbrook-05.txthttp://www.luminist.org/archives/kleps_millbrook-05.txt
the first of religious philosophers. He has no second. He has distanced all his competitors so decidedly that it is not worthwhile to place them. His highness is first, and the re
Evil as the Absence of Empathyhttps://gadfly.igc.org/eds/ethics/evil.htm
by numerous moral philosophers, and validated by the scientific study of human personality. Empathy is the foundation of the moral teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. In that most-quo
Before Camus: Gustave Le Bon on ‘The World in Revolt’ | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4272
formula “the German philosophers condemn it” and “the diplomatists distrust it”; nevertheless as Le Bon writes, “the Socialist dreamer… regards it as the regenerator of the human
Irrational Politicshttps://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/papers/irrationality.htm
desires). But many philosophers think that we can’t control our beliefs—at least not directly. To show this, they often give examples of obviously false propositions,
Tibor Machan "Epistemology and Moral Knowledge"http://anthonyflood.com/machanmoralknowledge.htm
number of working philosophers. But while a resurgence of naturalism has emerged on several philosophical fronts, not much has been done to synthesize it, to assemble its various
Find more...