On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy (1856)http://webarchive.me/geocities/Heartland/5654/orthodox/kireyevsky_new-principles.html
convictions than the philosophers themselves. For what kind of religion is it that cannot stand in the light of science and consciousness? What kind of faith is it that is incompa
Ivan Kireyevsky: On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy (1856)
Orgy of the Will: A Philosophy of the Futurehttp://orgyofthewill.net/
God 1607. Critics not philosophers 1606. Read everywhere 1605. Old icy 1604. Paying the poor 1603. Too gay for thought 1602. The subject and its audience 1601. It's coming 1600. T
Dialetheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2010 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/dialetheism/
the face of what most philosophers take to be common sense. Actually, that dialetheism challenges the LNC needs qualification, since the LNC is accepted as a general logical law i
Courage Style Aristocracyhttp://thescorp.multics.org/22nietzsche.html
"career philosophers" so to speak. Schopenhauer claimed to be a philosopher of life who had the independence of means not to need to earn his living from his writing. In
Tarot Hermeneuticshttp://www.tarothermeneutics.com/
Jung's Four and Some Philosophers: A Paradigm for Philosophy by Thomas Mulvihill King (Notre Dame) The Question of Psychological Types: The Correspondence of C. G. Jung and Hans S
The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.https://larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3045pagan_isaac.html
sort of political philosophers and kindred scoundrels might consider to be excessive admiration for the practice of scientific progress. Therefore, by such "brainwashing" of popul
Marxist Thought & Monism -Second Editionhttp://www.ghandchi.com/2055-MarxismEng.htm
said : "The philosophers have merely *interpreted* the world in various ways; the point, however, is to *change* it." (Karl Marx, 'Theses on Feuerbach ', CharlesLewis
این رساله نتیجه پژوهشهایی درباره مونیسم و پلورالیسم بود که این قلم در ایران در پی انقلاب 1357 و به قدر
Adorno - Being and Existencehttp://www.beyng.com/docs/Adorno-BeingExistence.html
may have caused the philosophers—except for Nietzsche, perhaps—to gloss it over. It is more the premise of understanding philosophical texts than it is their succinct quality. It
Theodor Adorno's Being and Existence
Find more...