What is pseudoscience?http://www.chem1.com/acad/sci/pseudosci.html
meet the approval of biologists, but superintendents or principals discourage teachers from discussing it. Or teachers themselves avoid the topic, fearing protests from fundamenta
What is pseudoscience, and how can you recognize it?
PHILOSOPHY : The End of Physicalismhttp://sofiatopia.org/equiaeon/materialism.htm
Do famous evolutionary biologists regularly and with the same bravado with which they attack irrational beliefs put to the fore this evidence contradicting the independence of sel
Epistemological, Metaphysical and Neuro-Physical Arguments Against Materialism in All Its Forms
Cretin Hop!https://philosophy.nekhbet.com/cretin.shtml
world with it. To him, biologists are not entitled to choose their own Sexual Selection terminology. Evo-bio must bow to him. The paradoxical irony is that had non-human organisms
philosophy, science, physics, biology, gravity, sexual selection, Gerald M Koufeldt, Rob L Norton.
Darwinian insecticidehttps://philosophy.nekhbet.com/chem.shtml
Until such time that biologists amass sufficient evidence to refute their own theory, the terms: "preference", "resistance", "(active, passive and cryptic) choice", "gift", "compe
philosophy, science, biology, evolution, Sexual Selection, Darwin, Rob L Norton.
Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concretehttp://papert.org/articles/EpistemologicalPluralism.html
mainstream molecular biologists, take a more distant approach. Anne psychologically places herself in the space of her objects. She experiences her screens and birds as tangible,
ARCHIMEDES - GREATEST SCIENTIST EVER?https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/archimedes.html
it was less relevant to biologists such as Mendel (father of genetics), Darwin & Wallace , (evolution theory), and especially Pasteur , whose work on the germ theory of disease (w
Abolitionist.com : synthetic lifehttps://www.abolitionist.com/resource/synthetic-biology.html
them run. Synthetic biologists are convinced that, with enough knowledge, they will be able to write programs to control those genetic components, programs that would let them not
2blowhards.com: A Week with Gregory Cochran: Day Onehttp://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2009/01/a_week_with_gre.html
curious about what biologists people reference. What I encountered were quite a few references to Stephen Jay Gould, hardly any to other evolutionary theorists. Now it is not very
2blowhards.com - a weblog
An inedible vegetablehttps://philosophy.nekhbet.com/vege.shtml
biology. Evolutionary biologists pursue metaphor - not reality. Film at 11! Khuno wrote: You need to be rightly shamed for this, too. You are making the grossest anthropomorphicat
philosophy, logic, evolution, Sexual Selection, paradox, Rob L Norton, Khuno.
NMSR Speakers!http://www.nmsr.org/speakers.htm
not made their case to biologists, and don't deserve equal time in schools, because the fact of evolution appears to be incontrovertible. Gammill proceeded with a laundry list of
What's New! January 1994http://home.mcom.com/home/whatsnew/whats_new_0194.html
Of special interest to biologists are the Biologist's Control Panel , and the CEPH-Genethon Data Interface , which allows browsing and searching of the CEPH-Genethon physical map
The Other Idol-Breaker: Owen Barfield and the Plenitude of the Word | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4192
When geologists and biologists accept Baconian premises, the result is the dual farrago of random selection and the survival of the fittest. In Barfield’s characterization, Marx a
Find more...