Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 111http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_121.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
Dialetheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2010 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/dialetheism/
the face of what most philosophers take to be common sense. Actually, that dialetheism challenges the LNC needs qualification, since the LNC is accepted as a general logical law i
Georges Sorelhttps://www.sources.com/SSR/Docs/SSRW-Sorel_Georges.htm
thinkers or the social philosophers and reformers. He was, in fact, a mixture of both, but since he was a spectator in the workers' movement and not in any way a direct participan
News release
Geach on Ascriptivismhttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Geach2.htm
some Oxford philosophers, whom I shall call Ascriptivists, have resorted to denying that to call an act voluntary, intentional, and so forth, is any sort of causal statement, or i
Critique of Pure Reason (Prefaces and Introduction)http://depts.washington.edu/lsearlec/TEXTS/KANT/CR_PURE_R/1-PREFS.HTM
of all the dogmatic philosophers. He was the first to show by example (and by his example he awakened that spirit of thoroughness which is not extinct in Germany) how the secure p
Violence, Non-Violence, and Progress in History -- Satyagrahahttps://friesian.com/gandhi.htm
we are "professional" philosophers or not -- may be able to contribute to progress in history. My remarks are not intended to reflect the views of anyone else in particular, and I
World Peace Newsletter - inner peace, external peace, world peace, global peace.https://worldpeacenewsletter.com/
of China, as well as of philosophers like Tan Sitong or Liang Qichao. Another term used in the text, "qin-min" which James Legge, following Zhu Xi, amends to "xin-min" and transla
What's Wrong With Distributism (What's Wrong with the World)http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2010/03/whats_wrong_with_distributism.html
of it? Distributist philosophers? or, say, for example...Wall Street Banksters? The question answers itself. Posted by Steve Burton on March 12, 2010 5:20 PM | Del.icio.us | Perma
Summary of Pythagorean Theology I: Introductionhttp://opsopaus.com/OM/BA/ETP/I.html
to all of the following philosophers and theologians as Pythagoreans or Platonists, which is what they usually called themselves, for the terms "Neo-Pythagorean" and "Neo-Platonis
Find more...