Bayesian Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2009 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/ARCHIVES/WIN2009/entries/epistemology-bayesian/
to certainty. But many philosophers would object to assigning probability of one to any contingent statement, even an evidential statement, because, for example, it is well-known
History of Philosophyhttps://friesian.com/history.htm
be one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th Century. Πολυμαθίη νόον ἔχ
The Karl Popper Webhttp://www.tkpw.net/
including much by philosophers of major reputation. His accounts of instrumental rationality, of property rights, of public goods problems, and of restitution for criminal cases,
For those interested in the philosophy of Karl Popper. Referenced by major institutions such as the B.B.C., The Encyclopaedia Britannica, and The British Science Museum. The site h
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
Popper on the A Priorihttps://friesian.com/samra.htm
arguments from other philosophers levied against Kant. The logicist projects from Frege and Russell provided arguments against Kant's intuitionalist mathematics. Poincar? had alre
Some Metaphysics of Angular Momentum and Gravityhttps://friesian.com/angular.htm
most, physicists and philosophers. After all, Einstein proved that Absolute Space doesn't exist . All space is Relative ; and Leibniz was decisively vindicated against Isaac Newto
Tibor Machan "Epistemology and Moral Knowledge"http://anthonyflood.com/machanmoralknowledge.htm
number of working philosophers. But while a resurgence of naturalism has emerged on several philosophical fronts, not much has been done to synthesize it, to assemble its various
Find more...