Beginning of Modern Science & Modern Philosophyhttps://friesian.com/hist-2.htm
of theology," modern philosophers have often thought of their discipline as little more than the "handmaiden of science." Even for those who haven't thought that, the shadow of sc
Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 22http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_11.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
Is Love Like A Drug?https://www.sensualism.com/love/druglove.html
consciousness, say the philosophers, no amount of scientific explanation is a substitute for personal, subjective experience. They call it the "hard problem" of consciousness. Wit
Victorian Age, by William Ralph Ingehttps://www.ajhw.co.uk/books/book78/book78.html
and Browning; the Greek philosophers reached as great ages as Victorian theologians; but if you look at the dates in other flowering times of literature you will find that the lif
Facet analysis (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/facet_analysis.htm
been out of favor among philosophers for a long time. A reviewer wrote the following about Parry and Hacker’s ( 1991 ) book Aristotelian Logic : [Aristotelian logic] has bee
The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be t
Representationalismhttps://zerocontradictions.net/epistemology/representationalism
ones by analytic philosophers) to Sorites Paradox don’t actually solve it. They’re just playing language games. Knowing how to solve the Sorites Paradox is helpful for
Truth and knowledge are representative models of reality that have predictive and explanatory power and are derived from the senses. The Platonic, Correspondence, Pragmatist, and S
The Kant-Friesian Theory of Religion, Rudolf Ottohttps://friesian.com/numinos.htm
rigorous enough for philosophers) and is too easily misunderstood and dismissed as describing some kind of mysticism . Even in the history of religion, Otto's own analysis often d
Why It's So Difficult To Change People's Mindshttps://zerocontradictions.net/epistemology/difficult-to-change-minds
keep up with Science. Philosophers are still debating if there is a God or no God, one world or multiple worlds, free will or determinism, which theory of truth is the best, and s
Belief networks, selective attention and blind spots, echo chambers, censorship, identities, and genetic differences make it difficult to change people's minds.
The Historical Conception of Leisure | Pilledtexts.comhttps://pilledtexts.com/the-historical-conception-of-leisure/
where guardians and philosophers, unburdened by menial tasks, could dedicate themselves entirely to contemplation and the pursuit of truth. Education, in this vision, was not a hu
§ 0 Leisure in Classical Antiquity: The Foundation of Intellectual Life Men must be able to engage in business and go to war, but leisure and peace are better; …
Social Psychology, Religious Belief, Censorship and the Holocaust. A Reviewhttps://www.heretical.com/sgs-1998/socsci.html
there was a school of philosophers, which included Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who maintained that chimpanzees and other anthropoid apes were man (Baker, 1974: 22-23). A more contempor
Simon Sheppard reviews the ‘Holocaust’ as a religion. The Commonplace, Contagion, Granfalloon, Heuristic and phantom object are quoted. With historical notes.
Universalism, the Prevailing Doctrine of the Christian Church During its First Five Hundred Yearshttps://tentmaker.org/books/Prevailing.html
teachings of the best philosophers." And Arnobius testifies that Christians included orators, grammarians, rhetoricians, lawyers, physicians, and philosophers. And it was pre
Printed in 1899, this book gives conclusiveevidence that Christian Universalism was a prevalent doctrine in early Christian history.
Great Men and their Environmenthttps://bactra.org/James/great_men.html
Pre-Darwinian philosophers had also tried to establish the doctrine of descent with modification; but they all committed the blunder of clumping the two cycles of causation into o
Find more...