ERBzine 1937: Secret History of Opar by Den Valdronhttps://www.erbzine.com/mag19/1937.html
rulers, craftsmen, philosophers, etc. And how much of each, and in what proportions it has of each depends on the importance that it places on each. Well, the United S
Secret History of Opar by Den Valdron
Philosophy of Language in Classical Chinahttps://philosophy.hku.hk/ch/lang.htm
problems that classical philosophers exposed in anti-language positions. The original Chinese theories presuppose many interesting background assumptions about language. First, th
An extended encyclopedia article discussing Chinese theory of language especially in the Later Mohists, Gongsun Long, Hui Shi, and Zhuangzi.
The Cult of Scientific Management by John Taylor Gattohttps://archive.lewrockwell.com/gatto/gatto-uhae-9.html
heiresses, scientists, philosophers, bombazines, gazebos, trust-fund babies, and successful men and women of affairs became the most potent force in the creation of the modern wel
Beyond Good And Evil. The Free Spirithttps://www.meta-religion.com/Philosophy/Biography/Friedrich_Nietszche/beyond_good_and_evil_ii.htm
serious. Take care, philosophers and friends, of knowledge, and beware of martyrdom! Of suffering "for the truth's sake"! Even of defending yourselves! spoils all the in
The Birth of Tragedyhttp://nietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_the_birth_of_tragedy/the_birth_of_tragedy.htm
words by Idealistic philosophers), but among "deceptions," as semblance, delusion, error, interpretation, contrivance, art. Perhaps the depth of this antimoral propensity is best
Materialism as conceived by ChatGPThttps://www.materialism.com/chatgpt/
numerous variants, and philosophers often disagree about exactly how to define and distinguish these positions." Give an overview of the history of materialism. "Materialism has a
What's Wrong With the World, by G.K. Chestertonhttps://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1717/pg1717-images.html
useless arguments of philosophers; I mean the joke about which came first, the chicken or the egg? I am not sure that properly understood, it is so futile an inquiry after all. I
The Critique of Pure Reason, by Immanuel Kanthttps://www.ajhw.co.uk/books/book166.html
broke upon all natural philosophers. They learned that reason only perceives that which it produces after its own design; that it must not be content to follow, as it were, in the
Sartor Resartus by Thomas Carlyle.https://ithaka.github.io/ugw-works/sartor/
cooks to feed him, philosophers to teach him, kings to mount guard over him,—to the length of sixpence.—Clothes too, which began in foolishest love of Ornament, what have they not
Find more...