On Heidegger's Nazism and Philosophyhttps://friesian.com/rockmore.htm
contempt for other philosophers, appeared to wish. Yet, as one of Heidegger's most perceptive critics, Paul Hühnerfeld, has said: "These books, whose meaning was barely
Natural Law: Jerusalem vs. Athenshttp://theonomy.net/natural_law.htm
Rome. Stoic political philosophers had to replace their theory of the autonomy of the polis and its laws. They wanted to find some theoretical foundation for their ethical system,
The Science and Technology Needed To Colonize Marshttps://larouchepub.com/lar/2019/4616-the_science_and_technology_nee.html
only theologians, philosophers, and a handful of scientists who think philosophically, concern themselves with such ideas. For that reason, most readers may have some difficulty,
The Project Gutenberg eBook of A General View of Positivism, by Auguste Comte.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/53799/pg53799-images.html
in a century; and philosophers have seldom had justice done them until some generations have passed. The difficulties presented by the scientific form of Comte’s works have been o
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)https://friesian.com/wittgen.htm
by professional philosophers. But that is just the point. In Twentieth Century philosophy, the pointless and the empty are regarded as the pinnacle of wisdom. When obscure, hermet
George Smith, "In Defense of Rational Anarchism"http://anthonyflood.com/smithrationalanarchism.htm
that it was these two philosophers of sovereignty who, more than anyone else, separated sovereignty from its religious roots in the divine right of kings, gave it a secular founda
Not Related! A Big-Braned Podcasthttps://notrelated.xyz/
by early 20th century philosophers to distinguish "science" from other realms. It overturns the assumptions of logical positivism and returns us to the conception of knowledge hel
Meditopia -- Chapter 5https://meditopia.org/chap5.htm
theologians and philosophers for millenia . . . the myths themselves do not present a straightforward, unified explanation, rather, in describing what seems to be a shift in the f
Philosophical Problems with Calculushttps://friesian.com/calculus.htm
I would say that the philosophers should pay more attention to 0/0 first , since that is where the trouble starts. TAKING A DERIVATIVE I. y = 3x 2 + 4x + 5 Given an equation, wher
SECTION ONE : Of First and Last Thingshttp://nietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_human_all_too_human/sect1_of_first_and_last_things.htm
2 Congenital defect of philosophers . All philosophers suffer from the same defect, in that they start with present‑day man and think they can arrive at their goal by analyz
WSM: One Substance (Space) & One Law explains causal connection, Metaphysics: deduces Quantum Physics, Einstein Relativity, Cosmology</tithttps://www.spaceandmotion.com/
and truth, something philosophers have been seeking for thousands of years. Further, WSM also deduces the very foundations of Science (as a correct understanding of reality must).
On Truth and Reality: One Substance (Vibrating Space) - One Law (Wave Energy determines Velocity): Uniting Metaphysics, Philosophy, Physics with WSM, the SSW
The Theory of Property - Proudhonhttp://www.ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/library/ToPSummary-Proudhon.html
economists, and philosophers. The principle of appropriation is that every product of labour, — such as a bow, some arrows, a plough, a rake, a house, — belongs by rig
Theory of Property
Find more...