The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2013/entries/incommensurability/
by two influential philosophers of science: Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. They appeared to be challenging the rationality of natural science and were called in Nature , “
The Mythopoeic Society - The Horn of Rohanhttps://www.mythsoc.org/horn-of-rohan.htm
linguists, philosophers, theologians, ethnologists, sociologists, and all other scholars interested in the following areas: 1. Mythopoeia and new mythology in literature - mythic
The Science and Technology Needed To Colonize Marshttps://larouchepub.com/lar/2019/4616-the_science_and_technology_nee.html
only theologians, philosophers, and a handful of scientists who think philosophically, concern themselves with such ideas. For that reason, most readers may have some difficulty,
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)https://friesian.com/wittgen.htm
by professional philosophers. But that is just the point. In Twentieth Century philosophy, the pointless and the empty are regarded as the pinnacle of wisdom. When obscure, hermet
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Paganism Surviving in Christianity, by Abram Herbert Lewis.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/56650/pg56650-images.html
the gods. The heathen philosophers, Hesiod, Plato, and Apuleius, all thus speak of those persons. The last named philosopher says: ‘They are intermediate intelligences, by whom ou
Rudolf Otto -- Fear and Tremendumhttps://friesian.com/otto.htm
to be sure, most philosophers of religion have difficulty, sometimes astonishing difficulty, focusing on actual religions in their own terms -- while philosophers often happen to
Philosophical Problems with Calculushttps://friesian.com/calculus.htm
I would say that the philosophers should pay more attention to 0/0 first , since that is where the trouble starts. TAKING A DERIVATIVE I. y = 3x 2 + 4x + 5 Given an equation, wher
John Stuart Mill, The Utility of Religionhttp://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/three/utilrelig.html
of, as sceptical philosophers are sometimes inclined to believe. It is not enough to aver, in general terms, that there never can be any conflict between truth and utility; that i
History of Usury Prohibitionhttp://www.alastairmcintosh.com/articles/1998_usury.htm
added ancient Western philosophers and politicians, as well as various modern socio-economic reformers. It is the objective of this paper to outline briefly the history of
Ramsey on Universalshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Ramseyonuniversals.htm
by Mr. Russell that philosophers are very liable to be misled by the subject-predicate constructions of our language. They have supposed that all propositions must be of a subject
Gobineau, Race and Conquesthttp://www.fsmitha.com/h3/h45-gobineau.htm
macrohistory.com (PHILOSOPHERS and HISTORIANS – continued) home | 18-19th centuries index PHILOSOPHERS and HISTORIANS (7 of 7) previous | next Joseph Gobineau, Race and Conq
The 19th century French historian Gobineau on Aryan superiority and the blessings of conquest.
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Auguste Comte And Positivism, by John Stuart Mill.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/16833/pg16833-images.html
one upon which Positive philosophers must necessarily be agreed. It is one of M. Comte's mistakes that he never allows of open questions. Positive Philosophy maintains that within
Find more...