Comte's classification of the sciences (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/comte
mechanics) among French scientists, as against the Germans and Britons ( Fischer 1990 , 11). In a synoptic evaluation of his early outlined Plan of 1830 Comte reads astronomy, phy
Auguste Comte is ostensibly the world's most famous classifier of the sciences in modern history. His whole life was dedicated to establishing a classification that conformed to t
An Expert Called Lindyhttps://scribe.rip/incerto/an-expert-called-lindy-fdb30f146eaf
and behavioral scientists, odds are it works at less than ten percent, unless it is also what has been covered by the grandmother and the classics, in which case why would you nee
IRFI - Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc.https://irfi.org/
Rise and Fall of Muslim Scientists 34. Scientific Evidence on the Oneness (Tawhid) of Allah (SWT) 35. Spiritual Medicine in the History of Islamic Medicine 36. Sufism and Quantum
A great informative and educational site about Islam, Allah, Muhammad,Quran and Muslim,an Islamic perspective of Scientific issues and information about Muslim Scholarships, and m
K. Eric Drexler : pioneer of nanotechnologyhttps://www.nanotechnologist.com/misc/
before an array of scientists from universities, industry, and national labs. Former chief arms control negotiator Paul Robinson spoke at a luncheon. The closing address was deliv
The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2013/entries/incommensurability/
it became possible for scientists to make and understand certain new statements only after a particular theory had been introduced (in the older vocabulary the new sentences are n
Amicus Briefhttps://archive.epic.org/crypto/export_controls/bernstein_brief.html
alliance of computer scientists and others concerned aboutthe impact of computer technology on society. CPSR members providepolicymakers and the public at large with realistic ass
Jewish success has depended on the evolution of a highly intelligent people using eugenicshttps://www.euvolution.com/neoeugenics/jewish_success.htm
finest technicians and scientists to develop new products and services to stay competitive. But supplying the demand for a highly intelligent (gifted) people for the scientific an
MacDonald argues that Jews are far more intelligent than whites due to 2000+ years of breeding (eugenics) leading to a phenomenally high IQ average of 117, with all the wealth and
Competitiveness Nations knowledge ideology globalhttp://www.compilerpress.ca/Competitiveness/Biblo%20Alpha.htm
Ch. II: The Last Time Scientists Struggled for the Soul of Science , 129-149. Ch. VIII: Conclusions , 379-423. Furubotn , E.G. & Pejovich , S., Property Rights and Economic Th
Rafe Champion's critical commentary on Stove's Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism.http://www.the-rathouse.com/AnythingGoes.html
helpful to practicing scientists than are those of Stove, Kuhn, Lakatos and Feyerabend. 4. The reasons for the rise of irrationalism are partly the failure of positivism and a com
Rafe Champion's critical commentary on Stove's Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism.
Meditopia -- Chapter 4, Final Section, Section 4https://meditopia.org/chap4-4.htm
like seasoned political scientists who, despite all evidence to the contrary, refuse to jettison the common narrative and accept that democracy is a co-opted tool of plutocratic p
Gender Confusionhttps://www.ldolphin.org/gender.html
been noticed by social scientists as well. In 1973, Steven Goldberg published The Inevitability of Patriarchy , in which he argued that biological differences between men and wom
Peter Suber, "Metaphilosophy, Topics"https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/meta/topics.htm
not agreed as often as scientists? Have philosophers agreed more than at first appears? Less? Can the apparent disagreement be reinterpreted as misunderstanding? as development? W
Find more...