Comte's classification of the sciences (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/comte
mechanics) among French scientists, as against the Germans and Britons ( Fischer 1990 , 11). In a synoptic evaluation of his early outlined Plan of 1830 Comte reads astronomy, phy
Auguste Comte is ostensibly the world's most famous classifier of the sciences in modern history. His whole life was dedicated to establishing a classification that conformed to t
IRFI - Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc.https://irfi.org/
Rise and Fall of Muslim Scientists 34. Scientific Evidence on the Oneness (Tawhid) of Allah (SWT) 35. Spiritual Medicine in the History of Islamic Medicine 36. Sufism and Quantum
A great informative and educational site about Islam, Allah, Muhammad,Quran and Muslim,an Islamic perspective of Scientific issues and information about Muslim Scholarships, and m
K. Eric Drexler : pioneer of nanotechnologyhttps://www.nanotechnologist.com/misc/
before an array of scientists from universities, industry, and national labs. Former chief arms control negotiator Paul Robinson spoke at a luncheon. The closing address was deliv
The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2013/entries/incommensurability/
it became possible for scientists to make and understand certain new statements only after a particular theory had been introduced (in the older vocabulary the new sentences are n
Jewish success has depended on the evolution of a highly intelligent people using eugenicshttps://www.euvolution.com/neoeugenics/jewish_success.htm
finest technicians and scientists to develop new products and services to stay competitive. But supplying the demand for a highly intelligent (gifted) people for the scientific an
MacDonald argues that Jews are far more intelligent than whites due to 2000+ years of breeding (eugenics) leading to a phenomenally high IQ average of 117, with all the wealth and
Rafe Champion's critical commentary on Stove's Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism.http://www.the-rathouse.com/AnythingGoes.html
helpful to practicing scientists than are those of Stove, Kuhn, Lakatos and Feyerabend. 4. The reasons for the rise of irrationalism are partly the failure of positivism and a com
Rafe Champion's critical commentary on Stove's Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism.
Objectivity Without Objectivismhttps://stpeter.im/writings/rand/objectivity.html
hard task, but one that scientists and historians have been pursuing for centuries. Wang's proposal was to do this by describing certain higher-level principles that apply to mult
Meditopia -- Chapter 4, Final Section, Section 4https://meditopia.org/chap4-4.htm
like seasoned political scientists who, despite all evidence to the contrary, refuse to jettison the common narrative and accept that democracy is a co-opted tool of plutocratic p
Gender Confusionhttps://www.ldolphin.org/gender.html
been noticed by social scientists as well. In 1973, Steven Goldberg published The Inevitability of Patriarchy , in which he argued that biological differences between men and wom
Peter Suber, "Metaphilosophy, Topics"https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/meta/topics.htm
not agreed as often as scientists? Have philosophers agreed more than at first appears? Less? Can the apparent disagreement be reinterpreted as misunderstanding? as development? W
Democracy and Universalism | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4365
intellectuals and scientists. The forces associated with Newtonian science and the Newtonian Enlightenment were liberal, progressive, reformist, and even revolutionary, and they p
Howard Wainerhttp://statlit.org/Wainer.htm
applied researchers, scientists, and certainly for all journalists.” — I. Elaine Allen, Babson College “A delightful and thought-provoking book on statistical graphics. Wainer pro
Find more...