Relativity Discussion Forumhttps://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/discussions/relativity1.htm
with respect to the gravitational field of the earth. It might be possible that light simply is linked to gravitation, and if you measure it while moving relative to the surroundi
Comments and questions regarding topics on the website physicsmyths.org.uk
Solar Physics Discussion Forumhttps://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/discussions/sun.htm
of about 5 AU and a gravitational particle energy of about 10 9 eV i.e. a temperature of 10 13 Kelvin. If anything like this is needed to produce heavier elements, it would be no
Comments and questions regarding topics on the website www.physicsmyths.org.uk
• Modern Physics a Fraud? - Superfluid helium? Speed of light a limit?, incredibility of quantum theory, Heisenberg's misunderstanding ohttp://big-lies.org/modern-physics-a-fraud/
from ordinary gravitational force, and are therefore not an absolute test of acceleration. This contention Einstein called the principle of equivalence. In trying to support this
Articles on Modern Theoretical Physics (rather than Empiricism and Technology). 'Superfluid helium', myth of the limiting speed of light, unanswered relativity paper, nuclear fra
viXra.org e-Print archive, Astrophysicshttps://vixra.org/astro/
2026-05-07 12:40:41 On Gravitational Binding Energy Evaluation Authors: Nicolas Poupart Comments: 19 Pages. We develop a hierarchical formulation for evaluating gravitational bind
Web Surfinghttp://web.cs.wpi.edu/~jshutt/surfing.html
The Secret History of Gravitational Waves (Tony Rothman, American Scientist , 2018) (18-Aug-19; 28-Nov-20) The Probabilistic Method (18-Feb-97; 10-Dec-20) Mathematics (John Savard
updateshttps://milesmathis.com/updates.html
link Olbers' Paradox to gravitational lensing. NEW PAPER, 5/27/2013. The Death of Polemics. The replies I get from mainstream scientists are as pathetic as the theories they hide
Embedded Problems in Celestial Mechanicshttps://milesmathis.com/cm.html
For Einstein, the gravitational field remains a Keplerian beast, in shape and size and influence. The only difference is in calculating specific accelerations within that field. &
this page is a critique of current celestial mechanics and nebular theory by Miles Mathis
Fourmilog: None Dare Call It Reason: August 2018 Archiveshttps://www.fourmilab.ch/fourmilog/archives/Monthly/2018/2018-08.html
relativity predicted gravitational radiation in 1915, but the phenomenon was not directly detected by experiment until a century later. Would inflation have to wait as long or lon
Home page of Blaze the Maintainer (Son of a Series of Dudes, thus a SubDude)http://subdude-site.com/
moon or sun by their gravitational attraction?? Slowly boiling-off?? A simple arithmetic calculation: (based on internal combustion engines) Cars and SUV's have a horsepower ratin
subdude-site.com provides four main typesof web pages : 1) links, 2) reference-info, 3) blog, 4) pictures ---in sub-categories such as- computers (linux, tcl-tk, web development)-
A Guide to Isaac Asimov's Essayshttp://www.asimovonline.com/oldsite/essay_guide.html
effect of tides /gravitational lenses evidence for another planet evidence of unseen mass in the universe gravitational lenses and the missing mass gravitational wave detection a
SOME CRUCIAL ISSUES OF MIND-BODY MONISMhttps://ditext.com/feigl/mbm.html
The identification of gravitational fields with a Riemannian (i.e., non-Euclidean) structure of space-time in the general theory of relativity provides an example in which no micr
Find more...