Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 22http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_11.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy (1856)http://webarchive.me/geocities/Heartland/5654/orthodox/kireyevsky_new-principles.html
convictions than the philosophers themselves. For what kind of religion is it that cannot stand in the light of science and consciousness? What kind of faith is it that is incompa
Ivan Kireyevsky: On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy (1856)
Orgy of the Will: A Philosophy of the Futurehttp://orgyofthewill.net/
God 1607. Critics not philosophers 1606. Read everywhere 1605. Old icy 1604. Paying the poor 1603. Too gay for thought 1602. The subject and its audience 1601. It's coming 1600. T
Great Men and their Environmenthttps://bactra.org/James/great_men.html
Pre-Darwinian philosophers had also tried to establish the doctrine of descent with modification; but they all committed the blunder of clumping the two cycles of causation into o
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
Cicero: De Officiishttps://constitution.org/1-History/rom/de_officiis.htm
foremost of present-day philosophers, and you will go on learning as long as you wish; and your wish ought to continue as long as you are not dissatisfied with the progress you ar
Notes on Democracy | Project Gutenberghttps://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/73150/pg73150-images.html
abetted by poets and philosophers, with occasional help from an eccentric king. One of the most valid of them—that of free speech—was actually given its first support in law by th
The Rediscovery of the Mind, by John R. Searlehttps://friesian.com/searle.htm
of course, only by philosophers, by certain philosophers. This passed unnoticed by society at large. The "rediscovery" is also likely to pass unnoticed. But has the mind been redi
Primates and the basis of moralityhttps://www.primates.com/morality/
is for biologists, not philosophers or theologians, to say what these rules are. Moral philosophers do not take very seriously the biologists’ bid to annex their subject, but they
Was The Iraq War BiblicallyJustified? -- Response to Samuele Bacchiocchihttps://KevinCraig.us/bacchiocchi.htm
countrymen, are great philosophers. They talk a lot about international problems, but they do very little about them. Michael Novak, a perceptive TV commentator, rightly observes
Love! - Exploring the Depths and Diversity of Lovehttp://www.hilmar-alquiros.de/Love!.htm
thinkers, from ancient philosophers to modern-day intellectuals, have embodied the spirit of Autophilosophy. They have often gone against established norms, trusting their own exp
Dive into 'Love! - Exploring the Depths and Diversity of Love,' covering types, objects, and the essence of love. From Agape to Eros, and Philautia to Xenia, explore romantic lov
The Hedonistic Imperative : Chapter Twohttps://www.hedweb.com/hedethic/hedon2.htm
even by the analytic philosophers for whom it was primarily intended. It contains a defence of HI on the basis of, first, practical means-ends rationality and, secondly, ethical n
how suffering and malaise will be superseded by states of sublime well-being
Find more...