Bayesian Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2009 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/ARCHIVES/WIN2009/entries/epistemology-bayesian/
to certainty. But many philosophers would object to assigning probability of one to any contingent statement, even an evidential statement, because, for example, it is well-known
Jerusalem vs. Athenshttp://vineandfigtree.university/Jerusalem_vs_Athens.htm
them all. Stoic philosophers sought a theory to substitute for the local religious rites-based theory of the city-state. The substitute was a theory of universal mankind , an idea
On the Preservation of Species:https://www.dematerialism.net/ops.htm
highly respected philosophers from the last generation: Russell, Popper, and other writers (who are not philosophers by trade) including Günter Grass. These people are
Self-knowledge and science as art [Ignace Haaz]https://www.dogma.lu/txt/HaazSelfKnowledge.htm
61); “we other philosophers”, “we fearless ones”, “we born guessers of riddles”, “we, firstlings and premature births of the coming centu
1821 Percy Bysshe Shelley: A Defence of Poetryhttps://www.lyriktheorie.uni-wuppertal.de/lyriktheorie/texte/1821_shelley.html
The distinction between philosophers and poets has been anticipated. Plato was essentially a poet – the truth and splendour of his imagery, and the melody of his language, a
Thomas Carlyle's "Signs of the Times"https://victorianweb.org/authors/carlyle/signs/signs1.html
farther. One of their philosophers has lately discovered, that "as the liver secretes bile, so does the brain secrete thought"; which astonishing discovery Dr. Cabanis [104/105],
Hegel: The State as God's Will by Murray N. Rothbardhttps://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard308.html
the attraction of philosophers to high-sounding jargon and gibberish almost for its own sake, followed by the gullibility of a credulous public. Thus Popper cites a statement by t
The Birth of Tragedyhttp://nietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_the_birth_of_tragedy/the_birth_of_tragedy.htm
words by Idealistic philosophers), but among "deceptions," as semblance, delusion, error, interpretation, contrivance, art. Perhaps the depth of this antimoral propensity is best
A Positive Account of Property Rightshttp://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Property/Property.html
deduced by libertarian philosophers trying to show what set of natural rights is just and by economists trying to show what set of legal rules would be efficient. And the structur
What's Wrong With Distributism (What's Wrong with the World)http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2010/03/whats_wrong_with_distributism.html
of it? Distributist philosophers? or, say, for example...Wall Street Banksters? The question answers itself. Posted by Steve Burton on March 12, 2010 5:20 PM | Del.icio.us | Perma
Find more...