Philosophy of Mind in Chinahttps://philosophy.hku.hk/ch/mind.htm
the attitude was what philosophers a de re attitude. The "subject" was in the world not in the mind. The context of use picked out the intended item. The attitude consis
Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 116http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_130.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
Equality (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/entries////////////////////////////////////////////////equality/
in a theory of justice? Philosophers have sought to clarify this by defending a variety of principles and conceptions of equality. This section introduces four such principles, ra
John Locke (1632-1704)https://friesian.com/locke.htm
one of the first modern philosophers to even have an academic career. But this was not in philosophy, whose university form at the time Locke did not like. Instead, Locke became a
Address Delivered Before the British Association Assembled at Belfast, With Additions (1874)https://victorianweb.org/science/science_texts/belfast.html
first of these three philosophers and the last, the human intellect was active in other fields than theirs. The sophists had run through their career. At Athens had appeared Socra
Critical Theory Today [By Douglas Kellner]https://www.dogma.lu/txt/Kellner-Revisiting01.htm
were trained as philosophers, and in the absence of the interdisciplinary research Institute, it is not surprising that critical theory would turn more philosophical and radicaliz
Some Non-Scientific Observations on Darwinhttp://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/lectures/darwinlecture.htm
natural scientists, as philosophers with an interest in the natural world, as people of God looking for evidence of His work in the natural world. They did not live in a world whe
Brand Blanshard "The Problem of Consciousness: A Debate with B. F. Skinner"http://anthonyflood.com/blanshardskinnerdebate.htm
can really know. Philosophers, following Descartes, begin with it in their analysis of mind. Almost everyone seems to begin with it in explaining his own behavior. The
Positive & Negative Liberties in Three Dimensionshttps://friesian.com/quiz.htm
in reference to the new philosophers coming up this sort would have to be a closed window and a bolted door. They belong, to make it short and sad, among the levellers , these fal
Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, by Charles Babbagehttps://www.ajhw.co.uk/books/book191.html
the aristocracy now for philosophers."——"There are very few persons who pursue science with true dignity; it is followed more as connected with objects of profit than
Evening and Morning Star Volume 1, Number 4http://www.centerplace.org/history/ems/v1n04.htm
systems of the ancient philosophers. But it is not in relation to ancient philosophers only, that we mean to consider the proposition in our text; we will examine it also in refer
Critique of Neo-Hegelianismhttps://mats-winther.github.io/beastrev.htm
The old subjectivistic philosophers — Descartes, Hume, and Kant — erred in postulating that only the perceptible has empirical validity.
Critique of Hegelianism and its continuation in Marxist and postmodern philosophy. The myth of modernity severs our roots in the natural order.
Find more...