Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 15http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_5.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
Commentary on the Apology of Socrateshttps://friesian.com/apology.htm
404 E, The Presocratic Philosophers , G.S. Kirk & J.E. Raven, Cambridge, 1964, p.211 Introduction Unless Plato had already written some short dialogues to illustrate Socrates' tec
Philosophy on a Circlehttps://philosopherswheel.com/philosophycircle.htm
(E. Alan Meece) http://philosopherswheel.com/philosophycircle.htm Please update if you came from another address. Presented at San Jose State University Alumni Conference, April 2
Understand the map of philosophy as a circle with polarities of rationalism existentialism essentialism empiricism spiritualism materialism. Discover the four directions of philoso
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)https://friesian.com/wittgen.htm
by professional philosophers. But that is just the point. In Twentieth Century philosophy, the pointless and the empty are regarded as the pinnacle of wisdom. When obscure, hermet
Camus' Hero of the Absurdhttps://friesian.com/gonzalez.htm
manner that positivist philosophers have so often undertaken. Yet this personal and autobiographical stake in a work of literature is an aspect of the creative process that ought
Logos Virtual Library: Nietzsche: The Antichristhttp://www.logoslibrary.org/nietzsche/antichrist.html
by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!? 8 It is necessary to say just whom we regard as our antagonists: theologians and all who have any theological blood in their ve
Overcoming Epistemology by Charles Taylorhttps://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/taylor.htm
views about famous philosophers of the tradition, which bore a rather distant relation to the truth. It is reminiscent of a parallel phenomenon in the arts, whereby the political
John Stuart Mill, The Utility of Religionhttp://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/three/utilrelig.html
of, as sceptical philosophers are sometimes inclined to believe. It is not enough to aver, in general terms, that there never can be any conflict between truth and utility; that i
Ramsey on Universalshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Ramseyonuniversals.htm
by Mr. Russell that philosophers are very liable to be misled by the subject-predicate constructions of our language. They have supposed that all propositions must be of a subject
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Auguste Comte And Positivism, by John Stuart Mill.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/16833/pg16833-images.html
one upon which Positive philosophers must necessarily be agreed. It is one of M. Comte's mistakes that he never allows of open questions. Positive Philosophy maintains that within
The Proceedings of the Friesian Schoolhttps://friesian.com/
the Friesians or other philosophers mentioned below directly are sought if they parallel or supplement Kantian or Friesian doctrine, from metaphysics to political economy, or thro
An electronic journal of philosophy, promoting the principles and the further development of the Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and the Friesian School,
Religion and Humanism, Why I am not a Christianhttps://friesian.com/why.htm
, the "natural philosophers" (in Latin, philosophi naturales ). Their focus on nature contrasts with the emphasis in Indian and Chinese philosophy (on salvation and morality) and
Find more...