Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2007 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2007/entries/moral-epistemology/
Traditionally philosophers have sought to explain the possibility of knowledge by appeal to at least some principles that can be grasped and defended a priori and thus independent
Rawls on Ruleshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Rawlsonrules.htm
been given by moral philosophers, but so far none of them has won any sort of general acceptance; no justification is without those who detest it. I hope to show that the use of t
SOcial Atomismhttps://gadfly.igc.org/libertarian/2-society.htm
view,” society is what philosophers call “an emergent entity.” Like chemical compounds such as water and table salt, the combination of elements produce a substance with propertie
HIST-Analytichttps://www.hist-analytic.com/
Brentano HELP For Czech Philosophers Carnap on the Lambda Operator Davidson, Akrasia, and Moore's Paradox (Revised) Nominalization and Event Causation: Vendler vs. Chisholm Russel
Max Stirner versus Morality: Part Ihttps://www.arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/stirner.htm
Even the hedonistic philosophers, from Aristippus to Epicurus, sought to show how their systems were compatible with upright behavior. Still, Stirner makes the valid point that, n
Rawls on Justice as Fairnesshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Rawlsfair.htm
moral concepts used by philosophers into which the concept of the duty of fair play fits quite naturally. 181 similar interests and capacities. In the same way, failing a special
Find more...