Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2007 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2007/entries/moral-epistemology/
Traditionally philosophers have sought to explain the possibility of knowledge by appeal to at least some principles that can be grasped and defended a priori and thus independent
Rawls on Ruleshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Rawlsonrules.htm
been given by moral philosophers, but so far none of them has won any sort of general acceptance; no justification is without those who detest it. I hope to show that the use of t
Right v Left: The Elementshttps://gadfly.igc.org/politics/elements.htm
is well known to philosophers. For example, Plato wrote at length about all the above concepts, and often came to no firm conclusion. In fact his best known work, “The Republic,”
SOcial Atomismhttps://gadfly.igc.org/libertarian/2-society.htm
view,” society is what philosophers call “an emergent entity.” Like chemical compounds such as water and table salt, the combination of elements produce a substance with propertie
HIST-Analytichttps://www.hist-analytic.com/
Brentano HELP For Czech Philosophers Carnap on the Lambda Operator Davidson, Akrasia, and Moore's Paradox (Revised) Nominalization and Event Causation: Vendler vs. Chisholm Russel
Rawls on Justice as Fairnesshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Rawlsfair.htm
moral concepts used by philosophers into which the concept of the duty of fair play fits quite naturally. 181 similar interests and capacities. In the same way, failing a special
The Metaphysical Versus the Man-Madehttp://www.ancapfaq.com/library/MetaphysicalManMade.html
A major part of the philosophers’ attack on man’s mind is devoted to attempts to obliterate the difference between the metaphysically given and the man-made. The confusion on this
The basic metaphysical issue that lies at the root of any system of philosophy: the primacy of existence or the primacy of consciousness.
Find more...