A Critique Of Ludwig Feuerbach's Philosophy Of Religionhttps://www.meta-religion.com/Philosophy/Articles/Philosophy_of_religion/critique_of_ludwig.htm
is a must read for philosophers as well as critical theologians. His ideas mark the pivotal shift from broadly accepted Theism to critical Atheistic Humanism. This paper will rema
Panentheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2009 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2009/entries/panentheism/
various theologians and philosophers developed ideas that are similar to themes in contemporary panentheism. These ideas developed as expressions of traditional theism. Proclus (4
Four Arguments for Transcendencehttps://www.peterkreeft.com/topics-more/4-arguments-transcendence.htm
usual position among philosophers in the Western world today, in fact the most usual position among academics generally, is some kind of reductionism. By “reductionism
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
THE EASTERN FATHERS OF THE FOURTH CENTURY ISBN 3-905238-07-1http://www.holytrinitymission.org/books/english/fathers_florovsky_1.htm
problems to which both philosophers and theologians are committed. I would not claim originality for my method, for it has been used occasionally by others. But I would underline
Philosophical Connections: Aristotlehttp://philosophos.sdf.org/philosophical_connections/profile_015.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Home Foreword by Geoffrey K
Summary of Pythagorean Theology I: Introductionhttp://opsopaus.com/OM/BA/ETP/I.html
to all of the following philosophers and theologians as Pythagoreans or Platonists, which is what they usually called themselves, for the terms "Neo-Pythagorean" and "Neo-Platonis
Find more...