Legal Positivism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2009 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/spr2009/entries/legal-positivism/
analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings. 1. Development and Influe
Stock's `An Account of the Life of George Berkeley, D.D.'https://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwilkins/Berkeley/Stock/Life.html
disputes of the Greek philosophers, not those particular great men who have been unhappily imposed on by it, that I complain of. Accordingly when the famous Milton had a mind to r
Philosophical Problems with Calculushttps://friesian.com/calculus.htm
I would say that the philosophers should pay more attention to 0/0 first , since that is where the trouble starts. TAKING A DERIVATIVE I. y = 3x 2 + 4x + 5 Given an equation, wher
Jews--The Archetypal Multiculturalistshttp://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/024334.html
beings. The classical philosophers taught the virtue of sophrosyne , or temperance, by which the respective parts of man’s being or of society restrain themselves to their p
The below is a chapter--written in 1998 and not edited or changed since then--from the vast unpublished book on mass...
Meaning and the Problem of Universalshttps://friesian.com/universl.htm
quite a few academic philosophers, may not realize that he is using a metaphysical principle when he does. That Heinlein has missed the implication of Postivist doctrine that meta
Stove, What Is Wrong With Our Thoughtshttps://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/%7Ejim/wrongthoughts.html
enquire what the pagan philosophers of that time were thinking about, we expect to hear of something more rational, at least, than questions about the Trinity. And so we do, at an
Find more...