Seven Brief Lessons on Physics, by Carlo Rovelli, 2016https://friesian.com/rovelli.htm
explanation that our observation disturbs the phenomenon, collapsing the wave function and producing the distribution of particles, doesn't hold, since the wave function collapses
WSM: One Substance (Space) & One Law explains causal connection, Metaphysics: deduces Quantum Physics, Einstein Relativity, Cosmology</tithttps://www.spaceandmotion.com/
flow align with recent observations from the JWST, and its metaphysical foundation resolves longstanding philosophical problems. WSM’s simplicity, coherence, and explanatory power
On Truth and Reality: One Substance (Vibrating Space) - One Law (Wave Energy determines Velocity): Uniting Metaphysics, Philosophy, Physics with WSM, the SSW
Beginning of Modern Science & Modern Philosophyhttps://friesian.com/hist-2.htm
His leap was from observation to inertia, and then mathematics. Galileo's conception of inertia needed perfecting because it still retained Mediaeval elements. For instance, Galil
Ken Libbrecht Pub Listhttp://www.its.caltech.edu/%7Eatomic/publist/kglpub.htm
J . 277 , 889 (1984). "Observations on a Solar Latitude-Dependent Limb Brightness Variation," J. R. Kuhn, K. G. Libbrecht and R. H. Dicke, Astrophys. J. 290 , 758 (1985). "Oblaten
PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantumhttps://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/lec9.html
have to connect to observation. So, suppose we have a bit that's described by this vector (α,β). Then we'll need to specify what happens if we look at the bit. Well, si
Archive | by Brian Koberleinhttps://briankoberlein.com/archive/
12th The Power of Observation 6th The Song of Distant Mountains 5th Carbon Deficit 4th Heart of Quarkness 3rd 2023 December Grand Old Spiral 27th A Cloudy Window 23rd Hawking the
The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/win2013/entries/incommensurability/
into a neutral observation language (cf. Hoyningen-Huene 1993, 213-214). In the late 1990s, he explicated incommensurability in terms of ineffability , emphasizing that it became
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Auguste Comte And Positivism, by John Stuart Mill.https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/16833/pg16833-images.html
The simplest observation, without which the preservation of life would have been impossible, must have pointed out many uniformities in nature, many objects which, under given cir
Criticism of Karl Popper in Martin Gardnerhttps://friesian.com/gardner.htm
from the experience and observation of particulars. Gardner, at the very least, blurs the distinction between universals and particulars. Thus, he cites the theory that "there are
The Everett Interpretationhttps://www.hedweb.com/everett/everett.htm
updated to reflect my observations in this one world? A1 References and further reading A2 Quantum mechanics and Dirac notation Q0 Why this FAQ? This FAQ shows how quantum paradox
The Everett 'Many-Worlds' FAQ
The Doomsday Argument, Adam & Eve, UN++, and Quantum Joehttps://anthropic-principle.com/preprints/cau/paradoxes
methods of deriving observational consequences from cosmological models ( Leslie 1989 ; Bostrom 2000b; Bostrom 2001a), arguments concerning how improbable was the evolution of int
Non-materialist physicalism as conceived by ChatGPThttps://www.physicalism.com/chatgpt/
problem arises from the observation that the brain processes information in a distributed manner across different regions and neural networks, yet our subjective experiences are u
Find more...