The Nature of Law (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2004 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/lawphil-nature/
But many legal philosophers doubt that there are legal principles of the kind Dworkin envisaged. There is an alternative, more natural way to account for the distinction between r
Logic and Language: Part Ihttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/logiclang/logiclang.htm
If the ancient Greek philosophers did not neatly distinguish between grammatical and logical analysis, it is because they believed they were constructing a genuinely logical langu
Anarcho-capitalist FAQhttp://www.ancapfaq.com/
moral autonomy as the philosophers call it. Is your life your own moral purpose? Do you deny you owe obedience to anyone except by consent? In natural rights language: Do you have
Anarcho-capitalism can also be called private property anarchism, market anarchism, libertarian anarchism, radical capitalism, or simply a free market stateless society.
The Fallacies of Egoism and Altruism, and the Fundamental Principle of Moralityhttps://friesian.com/moral-1.htm
reason far from being philosophers themselves! Even the great Chinaman of Koenigsberg was only a great critic. Friedrich Nietzsche , Beyond Good and Evil , translated by Marianne
Charles Hartshorne "Theism in Asian and Western Thought"http://anthonyflood.com/hartshornetheismasianwestern.htm
more firmly rejected by philosophers, in favor either of agnosticism or of some form of theism which conceives God as both eternal and temporal, both necessary and contingent, bot
Mengzi 孟子 (www.chinaknowledge.de)http://www.chinaknowledge.de/Literature/Classics/mengzi.html
Statecraft Masters and Philosophers Belles-Lettres and Collections Literature Confucian Classics Mengzi Jul 24, 2010 © Ulrich Theobald Mengzi 孟子 "Master Meng" is a collection
Mengzi 孟子 is a collection of stories of the Confucian philosopher Meng Ke 孟軻 (385–304 or 372–289 BCE) and his discussions with rulers, disciples and adversaries. It is
Purposefulness of classification (IEKO)https://www.isko.org/cyclo/purposefulness.htm
observation by two philosophers of science about how members of a particular community of interest (in casu, carpenters) require a classification of wood that addresses their spec
This article defends the thesis that all classifications serve some purposes better than others, and therefore that the idea of an all-purpose classification is untenable. This sho
On the Nature of European Culture and on Its Relationship to Russian Culturehttp://webarchive.me/geocities/Heartland/5654/orthodox/kireyevsky_culture.html
the most learned philosophers of the day — that is, the posing of arbitrary problems based on improbable assumptions and the analysis of all possible arguments for and against the
Kireyevsky's comparision of 19th century Russian culture with that of Europe
A redefinition of the derivativehttps://milesmathis.com/are.html
any qualms that philosophers might have. Had Berkeley been able to derive the equation by clearly more logical means, his comments would undoubtedly have been treated with more re
this page is about a correction to the foundation of the calculus in which I supercede both standard and non-standard analysis
Westcott & Hort: Translator's Beliefshttp://www.jesusisprecious.org/bible/wh-heretics.htm
the lost historians and philosophers! Hort wrote, quote: “For ourselves, we dare not introduce considerations which could not reasonably be applied to other ancient texts, supposi
Westcott and Hort: Translator's Beliefs
Chapter 15 of 'The Decline & Fall Of The Roman Empire'http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/gibbone/rome/volume1/chap15.htm
of the soul among the philosophers The writings of Cicero ( 51 ) represent in the most lively colours the ignorance, the errors, and the uncertainty of the ancient philosophers wi
Chapter 15. The progress of the Christian religion, and the sentiments, manners, numbers, and condition of the primitive Christians
The Bible and Political Correctnesshttps://www.bible.ca/ef/topical-the-bible-and-political-correctness.htm
discredited it. Soon, philosophers decided that there was no "objective" truth, so everything became subjective. What was true for one person may not be true for another
Find more...