Early Philosophical Interpretations of General Relativity (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2004 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/fall2004/entries/genrel-early/
some physicists and philosophers initially opposed it, mostly on non-physical grounds, surveyed here are the principal philosophical interpretations of the theory accepting it as
Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2007 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2007/entries/moral-epistemology/
Traditionally philosophers have sought to explain the possibility of knowledge by appeal to at least some principles that can be grasped and defended a priori and thus independent
Courage Style Aristocracyhttp://thescorp.multics.org/22nietzsche.html
"career philosophers" so to speak. Schopenhauer claimed to be a philosopher of life who had the independence of means not to need to earn his living from his writing. In
The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer: the Wisdom Of Life, by Arthur Schopenhauerhttps://www.gutenberg.org/files/10741/10741-h/10741-h.htm
aedistos bios.}{2} The philosophers of the Old Testament find themselves in a like contradiction. The life of a fool is worse than death {3} and— In much wisdom is much grie
Opacityhttps://fooledbyrandomness.com/notebook.htm
and mapped) objects, philosophers in concepts, jurists in constructs, logicians in operators (...), and idiots in words. We saw that risk and tail risk are mathematically se
Tarot Hermeneuticshttp://www.tarothermeneutics.com/
Jung's Four and Some Philosophers: A Paradigm for Philosophy by Thomas Mulvihill King (Notre Dame) The Question of Psychological Types: The Correspondence of C. G. Jung and Hans S
Tibor Machan "Epistemology and Moral Knowledge"http://anthonyflood.com/machanmoralknowledge.htm
number of working philosophers. But while a resurgence of naturalism has emerged on several philosophical fronts, not much has been done to synthesize it, to assemble its various
The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.https://larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3045pagan_isaac.html
sort of political philosophers and kindred scoundrels might consider to be excessive admiration for the practice of scientific progress. Therefore, by such "brainwashing" of popul
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)https://friesian.com/nietzsch.htm
215, The Presocratic Philosophers , G.S. Kirk & J.E. Raven, Cambridge University Press, 1964, p.195. ἀλλὰ τὰ μωρ
Find more...