Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2007 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2007/entries/moral-epistemology/
Traditionally philosophers have sought to explain the possibility of knowledge by appeal to at least some principles that can be grasped and defended a priori and thus independent
Dialetheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2010 Edition)https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/dialetheism/
the face of what most philosophers take to be common sense. Actually, that dialetheism challenges the LNC needs qualification, since the LNC is accepted as a general logical law i
Tibor Machan "Epistemology and Moral Knowledge"http://anthonyflood.com/machanmoralknowledge.htm
number of working philosophers. But while a resurgence of naturalism has emerged on several philosophical fronts, not much has been done to synthesize it, to assemble its various
Sartor Resartus | Project Gutenberghttps://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1051/pg1051-images.html
cooks to feed him, philosophers to teach him, kings to mount guard over him,—to the length of sixpence.—Clothes too, which began in foolishest love of Ornament, what have they not
The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.https://larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3045pagan_isaac.html
sort of political philosophers and kindred scoundrels might consider to be excessive admiration for the practice of scientific progress. Therefore, by such "brainwashing" of popul
Violence, Non-Violence, and Progress in History -- Satyagrahahttps://friesian.com/gandhi.htm
we are "professional" philosophers or not -- may be able to contribute to progress in history. My remarks are not intended to reflect the views of anyone else in particular, and I
bacon’sgodhttps://sirbacon.org/stephenmcknight.htm
work of "one of your philosophers." The allusion is to Plato's discussion of the golden age of Athens and to the demise of the great sea-going empire, Atlantis, found in the Timae
The Insufficiency of Empiricism: Part Ihttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/empiricism.htm
dogmatic and skeptic philosophers. These terms did not have their modern connotations, where the former entails uncritical assertions while the latter refers to critical thinking.
Find more...