Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 23http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_12.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
Why Not an Objectivisthttps://spot.colorado.edu/~huemer/papers/rand.htm
whatsoever, then the philosophers who claim there is a distinction must really be classifying statements entirely at random. If this is the case, what accounts for their intersubj
Logos Virtual Library: Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil, 5http://www.logoslibrary.org/nietzsche/beyond/5.html
been so modest. All the philosophers, with a pedantic and ridiculous seriousness, demanded of themselves something very much higher, more pretentious, and ceremonious, when they c
Adam Weishaupt's Illuminati: Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe - Carried on in the Secret Meetingshttp://www.bilderberg.org/lucis.htm
and the soi-disant philosophers, formed a numerous band, frequented the Lodges, and there discussed every topic of religion and politics. Specimens of this occupation appeared fro
Abraham Maslowhttp://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/maslow.html
artists and poets and philosophers (and psychologists!) being strange is so common because it has so much truth to it! We also have the example of a number of people who were crea
Summary of Pythagorean Theology V: Theurgyhttp://opsopaus.com/OM/BA/ETP/V.html
most famous Sages and Philosophers of antiquity, including Empedocles (c.495-435), Plato (427-347), Apollonius of Tyana (1 st cent. CE), Plutarch (c.46-c.125), Plotinus (205-270),
Sir Karl Popperhttps://friesian.com/popper.htm
to understand; and some philosophers, like Kant , had come close to recognizing it. It is still subject to some dispute, though mainly from those who misunderstand the rejection o
Pleasure as the Good in Epicureanism: Part Ihttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/ethics2.htm
Lives of Eminent Philosophers , which expounds a fairly detailed defense of the person and teachings of Epicurus. The Lives of Diogenes Laertius has been criticized as focusing to
Gnosticism from a Non-Voegelinian Perspective, Part III (Gnosticism in Modern Scholarship) | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4461
the old symbols as the philosophers and the Christian Fathers. One must grant to the ancient Gnostics a valid sense that a new image of reality was required because of the growing
Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals, Essay 1http://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/nietzsche/genealogy1.html
traditional manner of philosophers. Of that there is no doubt. The incompetence of their genealogies of morals reveals itself at the very beginning, where the issue is to determin
The Sanctity of Private Propertyhttps://anthonymludovici.com/sanctity.htm
Turning now to the philosophers and their work on the problem of private property, we encounter much the same striving as among the anthropologists, though with this difference &#
ON CONTRADICTIONhttps://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_17.htm
written by Soviet philosophers criticizing it, the Deborin school maintains that contradiction appears not at the inception of a process but only when it has developed to a certai
Find more...