The Wages of Unbelief (What's Wrong with the World)http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2007/08/the_wages_of_unbelief.html
The Human Life Review Religion/Philosophy/Apologetics Acton Institute American Chesterton Society Apologetics 315 Christian Apologetics Alliance Edward Feser First Things Fr. Z’s
On the Meaning of Racismhttp://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001100.html
life, its language, its religion. Merely to make this common-sense observation does not mean we are repeating the race-idolization of the 19th century racial theorists—or the roma
Today most people would describe this simple preference for one's own—stated plainly as it is here—as racist or xenophobic (if we are speaking about white people, that is); and al
Why It's So Difficult To Change People's Mindshttps://zerocontradictions.net/epistemology/difficult-to-change-minds
things, such as religion. Religion doesn’t spread through expanding rationality, instead it spreads through some combination of conquest, proselytization, child indoctrinati
Belief networks, selective attention and blind spots, echo chambers, censorship, identities, and genetic differences make it difficult to change people's minds.
The Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan Haidt | Derek Sivershttps://sive.rs/book/HappinessHypothesis
biased by their religion, their ideology, or their self-interest. Naive realism gives us a world full of good and evil, and this brings us to the most disturbing implication of th
Rawls on Justice as Fairnesshttps://www.hist-analytic.com/Rawlsfair.htm
defined by their common religion, and reference to this end would settle every question of right. The justice of practices does not come up until there are several different parti
Leading Edge International Research Grouphttp://trufax.org/
If we adhere to one religion or belief, we don't want to hear about the views of another. By putting walls between our filters, we protect our overall filter arrangement. We avoid
Leading Edge International Research Group Home Page. Planetary and Social Paradigm Analysis and Discussion
http://www.worldofradio.com/dxld3137.txthttp://www.worldofradio.com/dxld3137.txt
without attacking religion, since that is their main raison d'?tre. In a letter to the BBC's lawyers dropping the case "due to difficulties in funding further steps in the litigat
NMSR Speakers!http://www.nmsr.org/speakers.htm
beyond the question of religion to the broader question, why is creationism popular with children, even those of free-thinking or atheist families? She identified several onceptua
Ron Paul Reddit AMA Transcripthttp://amatranscripts.com/ama/ron_paul_2013-08-22.html
choice, whether it is religion, philosophy, or our personal habits. [deleted] That might be the ideal to seek and it should be talked about and maybe someday we can reach that. Th
View from the Righthttp://www.amnation.com/vfr/
attacks on religion and God. They begin with my three part exchange with her at VFR in December 2004, “God and the tsunami.” Non-Islam theories of Islamic extremism :
The passing scene and what it's about viewed from the traditionalist politically incorrect Right.
rat haus reality: exercising our intelligence with clarity & coherencehttp://ratical.org/
business, state, religion We are human beings And these memories Are trying to remind us Human beings, human beings It’s time to rise up Remember who we are &md
Frontpage Interview with Dr. Theodore Dalrymple: Our Culture, What’s Left Of Ithttps://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1487936/posts
by decency. Without religion or culture (and here I mean high, or high-ish, culture) evil is very attractive. It is not boring. FP: You mention that your d
Find more...