Moral Epistemology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2007 Edition)https://plato.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2007/entries/moral-epistemology/
Traditionally philosophers have sought to explain the possibility of knowledge by appeal to at least some principles that can be grasped and defended a priori and thus independent
Article from PHILOSOPHY PATHWAYS Issue 103http://philosophos.sdf.org/feature_articles/philosophy_article_110.html
not just philosophers philosophers should know lots of things besides philosophy Philosophical Connections Electronic Philosopher Feat
SECTION FOUR From the Soul of Artists and Writershttp://nietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_human_all_too_human/sect4_from_the_soul_of_artists.htm
not for physicists and philosophers. 161 Self overestimation in the faith in artists and philosophers . We all think that the goodness of a work of art or an artist is proven when
Tarot Hermeneuticshttp://www.tarothermeneutics.com/
Jung's Four and Some Philosophers: A Paradigm for Philosophy by Thomas Mulvihill King (Notre Dame) The Question of Psychological Types: The Correspondence of C. G. Jung and Hans S
Tibor Machan "Epistemology and Moral Knowledge"http://anthonyflood.com/machanmoralknowledge.htm
number of working philosophers. But while a resurgence of naturalism has emerged on several philosophical fronts, not much has been done to synthesize it, to assemble its various
The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.https://larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3045pagan_isaac.html
sort of political philosophers and kindred scoundrels might consider to be excessive admiration for the practice of scientific progress. Therefore, by such "brainwashing" of popul
Violence, Non-Violence, and Progress in History -- Satyagrahahttps://friesian.com/gandhi.htm
we are "professional" philosophers or not -- may be able to contribute to progress in history. My remarks are not intended to reflect the views of anyone else in particular, and I
René Guénon and Eric Voegelin on the Degeneration of Right Order | The Brussels Journalhttps://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/5081
who ought to be philosophers prefer the role of imperial entrepreneurs will have to go through many convulsions before it has got rid of itself, together with the arrogance of its
Adorno - Being and Existencehttp://www.beyng.com/docs/Adorno-BeingExistence.html
may have caused the philosophers—except for Nietzsche, perhaps—to gloss it over. It is more the premise of understanding philosophical texts than it is their succinct quality. It
Theodor Adorno's Being and Existence
The Insufficiency of Empiricism: Part Ihttps://arcaneknowledge.org/philtheo/empiricism.htm
dogmatic and skeptic philosophers. These terms did not have their modern connotations, where the former entails uncritical assertions while the latter refers to critical thinking.
Find more...