Legal Foundations of a Free Societyhttps://xenisa.github.io/kinsella/lffs/legal-foundations-of-a-free-society.html
and fancies of some philosophers that are supposed to do the job. But this is hardly less arbitrary, one would think! And, of course, since no real person had or could have agreed
The Proceedings of the Friesian Schoolhttps://friesian.com/
the Friesians or other philosophers mentioned below directly are sought if they parallel or supplement Kantian or Friesian doctrine, from metaphysics to political economy, or thro
An electronic journal of philosophy, promoting the principles and the further development of the Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and the Friesian School,
Objectivity Without Objectivismhttps://stpeter.im/writings/rand/objectivity.html
between scientists and philosophers, especially where they meet in the borderlands between biology, the social sciences, and the humanities. We are approaching a new age of synthe
SCUM Manifesto, by Valerie Solanashttp://xahlee.org/p/scum.html
female strengths; most philosophers, not quite so cowardly, face the fact that make lacks exist in men, but still can't face the fact that they exist in men only. So they label th
Robert Filmer: Patriarcha (1680)https://constitution.org/1-History/eng/patriarcha.htm
guided these two philosophers in finding out of this lineal subjection deduced from the laws of the first parents, according to that rule of St. Chrysostom: "God made all mank
THE PUSH AND CRITICAL DRINKERShttps://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~jim/push.html
were largely run by philosophers; the Push was a wider movement of which the Libertarian Society was a core and source of ideology. The Freethought Society, as we saw, was a vehic
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Essays of Schopenhauer, by Arthur Schopenhauerhttps://www.gutenberg.org/files/11945/11945-h/11945-h.htm
the best abused amongst philosophers; he has many times been explained and condemned exhaustively, and no doubt this will be as many times repeated. What the trend of his underlyi
On American Morals, by G. K. Chestertonhttps://www.fisheaters.com/onamericanmorals.html
theologians and moral philosophers have meant by a sin, these people have no more idea than a child drinking milk has of a great toxicologist analyzing poisons. It may be a credit
On American Morals, by G. K. Chesterton
Baudrillard Short Introductionhttps://publish.uwo.ca/~dmann/baudrillard1.htm
and for starting philosophers and social and cultural theorists is best taken in small doses. If you read his work, remember that his central claim about postmodern culture (thoug
Leonard Nelsonhttps://friesian.com/nelson.htm
going around among philosophers, some of whom are more honest about it than others. This serves to impeach philosophers in an area that should be of serious interest to them: Curi
The Case of Wagner"http://nietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_various/the_case_of_wagner.htm
myopic. But among philosophers this is, like every horizon, a mere case of lack of understanding, a sort of shutting the gate at the point where their world only begins— the
Hedonism as conceived by a digial zombiehttps://www.hedonism.org/chatgpt/
ancient societies and philosophers were instrumental in its early development? "Hedonism as a philosophical concept originated in Ancient Greece, with the word itself deriving fro
Find more...