The Political Graveyardhttps://www.politicalgraveyard.com/
(170), librarians (30), scientists (88), economists (86), information technology professionals (45), inventors (67). Politicians in media, sports, and entertainment: newspapers (1
A database of political history and cemeteries, with brief biographical entries for 338,260U.S. political figures, living and dead, from the 1700s to the present.
Cultural Carrying Capacity - The Garrett Hardin Society - Articleshttps://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_cultural_carrying_capacity.html
spoke for most of the scientists of his day when he identified the inner force that drew him to scientific work: "I believe with Schopenhauer that one of the strongest motives tha
Cultural Carrying Capacity by Garrett Hardin - The Garrett Hardin Society - Articles
Rationality: From AI to Zombieshttps://elizier.neocities.org/
trict Enough 248. Do Scientists Already Know This Stuff? 249. No Safe Defense, Not Even Science 250. Changing the Definition of Science 251. Faster Than Science 252. Einstein’s Spe
Occult Roots Of The Modern Bible Versionshttp://www.jesusisprecious.org/bible/occult_roots_of_modern_versions.htm
and speculations of scientists and scholars were coming into marked and public conflict with the teachings of Christianity. It was, tragically enough, the most sensitive and the m
Occult Roots Of The Modern Bible Versions
A review of three books on historical eugenics: "War Against the Weak", "The Unfit", and "American Eugenics".https://www.euvolution.com/neoeugenics/historical_eugenics.htm
to eugenicists and race scientists throughout the biological sciences to achieve the goal of creating a superior race." Just how were they going to do that without a positive
These three recent books are an update of reviews on eugenic books. The purpose of most books on eugenics, is to link eugenics with genocide, the Holocaust, etc. But a careful read
Orwellian Economics: Dan Sullivan: Saving Communitieshttp://www.savingcommunities.org/econ/orwellian.html
as a science if scientists had let the sloppy usage of some king define aerodynamic terminology.) Marx's central thesis is that capital exploits labor, and now we see capital rede
Why It's So Difficult To Change People's Mindshttps://zerocontradictions.net/epistemology/difficult-to-change-minds
many expert physicists, scientists, controlled demolitionists, etc. During the debate, Mohr made arguments against many of the problems of the controlled demolition hypothesis, su
Belief networks, selective attention and blind spots, echo chambers, censorship, identities, and genetic differences make it difficult to change people's minds.
Meditopia -- Chapter 2https://www.meditopia.org/chap2.htm
and "employ charlatan scientists" to run them. The fact is, the new, more expensive "atypical" drugs are no more effective than the old; only, a new set of side effects have been
Vygotsky's Idea of Gestalt and its Origins by Andy Blunden March 2008https://ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/works/gestalt.htm
Late 19th century scientists wanted to resolve these problems by finding the source of concepts, or at least form , in sensation itself. In his influential Analysis of Sensations
From Cybernetics to Littleton: Techniques of Mind Controlhttps://larouchepub.com/other/2000/2718_cybernetics_to_littleton.html
of prominent social scientists openly spelled out their goal, of using the wartime-tested techniques of mass psychological manipulation, to pervert and control the American people
The ongoing self-destruction of psychoanalysishttps://mats-winther.github.io/destruc.htm
framework. It causes scientists to lie to themselves, and this is neurotic. Furthermore, the search for truth must be a search for valuable truth, anything else is neurotic. Maxwe
Psychoanalytic theoretical chaos depends on an insufficient metaphysical groundwork. Empirical science must be buttressed by a sound metaphysic.
Sociobiology and Progressivismhttps://lukesmith.neocities.org/sociobiology
puts it, although scientists studying sociobiology are liable to disagree on minutiae, sociobiology is "no more controversial, in itself, than metallurgy or ornithology". If it's
Find more...